Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37566271›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Natural language processing to predict isocitrate dehydrogenase genotype in diffuse glioma using MR radiology reports.

Minjae Kim, Kai Tzu-Iunn Ong, Seonah Choi, Jinyoung Yeo, Sooyon Kim, Kyunghwa Han, Ji Eun Park, Ho Sung Kim, Yoon Seong Choi, Sung Soo Ahn and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Minjae KimDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kai Tzu-Iunn OngDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, College of Computing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Seonah ChoiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jinyoung YeoDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, College of Computing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Sooyon KimDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Kyunghwa HanDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Eun ParkDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Ho Sung KimDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Yoon Seong ChoiDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sung Soo AhnDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jinna KimDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung-Koo LeeDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Beomseok SohnDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. beomseoksohn@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6765-8056
Yonsei University · KRUlsan College · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the performance of natural language processing (NLP) models to predict isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status in diffuse glioma using routine MR radiology reports. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective, multi-center study included consecutive patients with diffuse glioma with known IDH mutation status from May 2009 to November 2021 whose initial MR radiology report was available prior to pathologic diagnosis. Five NLP models (long short-term memory [LSTM], bidirectional LSTM, bidirectional encoder representations from transformers [BERT], BERT graph convolutional network [GCN], BioBERT) were trained, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was assessed to validate prediction of IDH mutation status in the internal and external validation sets. The performance of the best performing NLP model was compared with that of the human readers.

resultsA total of 1427 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 54 ± 15; 779 men, 54.6%) with 720 patients in the training set, 180 patients in the internal validation set, and 527 patients in the external validation set were included. In the external validation set, BERT GCN showed the highest performance (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.89) in predicting IDH mutation status, which was higher than LSTM (AUC 0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.81; p = .003) and BioBERT (AUC 0.81, 95% CI 0.76-0.85; p = .03). This was higher than that of a neuroradiologist (AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.76-0.84; p = .005) and a neurosurgeon (AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.76-0.84; p = .04).

conclusionBERT GCN was externally validated to predict IDH mutation status in patients with diffuse glioma using routine MR radiology reports with superior or at least comparable performance to human reader. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Natural language processing may be used to extract relevant information from routine radiology reports to predict cancer genotype and provide prognostic information that may aid in guiding treatment strategy and enabling personalized medicine. KEY POINTS: • A transformer-based natural language processing (NLP) model predicted isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation status in diffuse glioma with an AUC of 0.85 in the external validation set. • The best NLP models were superior or at least comparable to human readers in both internal and external validation sets. • Transformer-based models showed higher performance than conventional NLP model such as long short-term memory.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaGenotypeHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNatural Language ProcessingNeoplasm GradingRetrospective StudiesIsocitrate DehydrogenaseGliomaIsocitrate dehydrogenaseNatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID37566271
OpenAlexW4385751474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.