Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37566270›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Voxel-wise mapping of DCE-MRI time-intensity-curve profiles enables visualizing and quantifying hemodynamic heterogeneity in breast lesions.

Zhou Liu, Bingyu Yao, Jie Wen, Meng Wang, Ya Ren, Yuming Chen, Zhanli Hu, Ye Li, Dong Liang, Xin Liu and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Zhou Liu *Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 113 Baohe Avenue, 518116, Shenzhen, China.
Bingyu Yao *Paul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, Shenzhen, China.
Jie WenDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 113 Baohe Avenue, 518116, Shenzhen, China.
Meng WangDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 113 Baohe Avenue, 518116, Shenzhen, China.
Ya RenDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 113 Baohe Avenue, 518116, Shenzhen, China.
Yuming ChenCollege of Computer and Information Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, 600 Ligong Road, Xiamen, China.
Zhanli HuPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, Shenzhen, China.
Ye LiPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, Shenzhen, China.
Dong LiangPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, Shenzhen, China.
Xin LiuPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, Shenzhen, China.
Hairong ZhengPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, Shenzhen, China.
Dehong LuoDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 113 Baohe Avenue, 518116, Shenzhen, China. 13926236152@163.com.
Na ZhangPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, Shenzhen, China. na.zhang@siat.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9510-4520

Funding

Key Laboratory for Magnetic Resonance and Multimodality Imaging of Guangdong Province 2020B1212060051Shenzhen Clinical Research Center for Cancer No. [2021] 287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo propose a novel model-free data-driven approach based on the voxel-wise mapping of DCE-MRI time-intensity-curve (TIC) profiles for quantifying and visualizing hemodynamic heterogeneity and to validate its potential clinical applications. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom December 2018 to July 2022, 259 patients with 325 pathologically confirmed breast lesions who underwent breast DCE-MRI were retrospectively enrolled. Based on the manually segmented breast lesions, the TIC of each voxel within the 3D whole lesion was classified into 19 subtypes based on wash-in rate (nonenhanced, slow, medium, and fast), wash-out enhancement (persistent, plateau, and decline), and wash-out stability (steady and unsteady), and the composition ratio of these 19 subtypes for each lesion was calculated as a new feature set (type-19). The three-type TIC classification, semiquantitative parameters, and type-19 features were used to build machine learning models for identifying lesion malignancy and classifying histologic grades, proliferation status, and molecular subtypes.

resultsThe type-19 feature-based model significantly outperformed models based on the three-type TIC method and semiquantitative parameters both in distinguishing lesion malignancy (respectively; AUC = 0.875 vs. 0.831, p = 0.01 and 0.875vs. 0.804, p = 0.03), predicting tumor proliferation status (AUC = 0.890 vs. 0.548, p = 0.006 and 0.890 vs. 0.596, p = 0.020), but not in predicting histologic grades (p = 0.820 and 0.970).

conclusionIn addition to conventional methods, the proposed computational approach provides a novel, model-free, data-driven approach to quantify and visualize hemodynamic heterogeneity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Voxel-wise intra-lesion mapping of TIC profiles allows for visualization of hemodynamic heterogeneity and its composition ratio for differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions. KEY POINTS: • Voxel-wise TIC profiles were mapped, and their composition ratio was compared between various breast lesions. • The model based on the composition ratio of voxel-wise TIC profiles significantly outperformed the three-type TIC classification model and the semiquantitative parameters model in lesion malignancy differentiation and tumor proliferation status prediction in breast lesions. • This novel, data-driven approach allows the intuitive visualization and quantification of the hemodynamic heterogeneity of breast lesions.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoplasmsBreastContrast MediaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesTimeContrast MediaBreast cancerDCE-MRIHemodynamic heterogeneityTime-intensity-curve profiles

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.