Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37566264›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Arterial spin labelling MRI for brain tumour surveillance: do we really need cerebral blood flow maps?

Wouter H T Teunissen, Anna Lavrova, Martin van den Bent, Anouk van der Hoorn, Esther A H Warnert, Marion Smits

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Arterial Spin Labeling: Key Concepts and Progress Towards Use as a Clinical Tool.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wouter H T TeunissenDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. w.teunissen@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4683-1366
Anna LavrovaDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Martin van den BentBrain Tumour Centre, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anouk van der HoornMedical Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Esther A H WarnertDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marion SmitsDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. marion.smits@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

LtC 80-85009-98-2008-NVvRVeni Vernieuwingsimpuls 91619121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesArterial spin labelling (ASL) perfusion MRI is one of the available advanced MRI techniques for brain tumour surveillance. The first aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) and non-quantitative perfusion weighted imaging (ASL-PWI) measurements. The second aim was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of ASL-CBF and ASL-PWI measurements as well as visual assessment for identifying tumour progression.

methodsA consecutive cohort of patients who underwent 3-T MRI surveillance containing ASL for treated brain tumours was used. ROIs were drawn in representative parts of tumours in the ASL-CBF maps and copied to the ASL-PWI. ASL-CBF ratios and ASL-PWI ratios of the tumour ROI versus normal appearing white matter (NAWM) were correlated (Pearson correlation) and AUCs were calculated to assess diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, lesions were visually classified as hypointense, isointense, or hyperintense. We calculated accuracy at two thresholds: low threshold (between hypointense-isointense) and high threshold (between isointense-hyperintense).

resultsA total of 173 lesions, both enhancing and non-enhancing, measured in 115 patients (93 glioma, 16 metastasis, and 6 lymphoma) showed a very high correlation of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.88-0.99) between ASL-CBF ratios and ASL-PWI ratios. AUC was 0.76 (95%CI: 0.65-0.88) for ASL-CBF ratios and 0.72 (95%CI: 0.58-0.85) for ASL-PWI ratios. Diagnostic accuracy of visual assessment for enhancing lesions was 0.72.

conclusionASL-PWI ratios and ASL-CBF ratios showed a high correlation and comparable AUCs; therefore, quantification of ASL-CBF could be omitted in these patients. Visual classification had comparable diagnostic accuracy to the ASL-PWI or ASL-CBF ratios. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study shows that CBF quantification of ASL perfusion MRI could be omitted for brain tumour surveillance and that visual assessment provides the same diagnostic accuracy. This greatly reduces the complexity of the use of ASL in routine clinical practice. KEY POINTS: • Arterial spin labelling MRI for clinical brain tumour surveillance is undervalued and underinvestigated. • Non-quantitative and quantitative arterial spin labelling assessments show high correlation and comparable diagnostic accuracy. • Quantification of arterial spin labelling MRI could be omitted to improve daily clinical workflow.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsLymphomaCerebrovascular CirculationHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpin LabelsSpin LabelsBrainBrain neoplasmsMagnetic resonance imagingSensitivity and specificity

Identifiers

PMID37566264
PMCPMC10598159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.