ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2023
Detection of synthetic analogues of insulin-like growth factor 1 in different biological fluids by liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry: comparison of different immunoaffinity protocols.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of immunoaffinity and antibody-free isotope dilution mass spectrometry approaches for plasma ProGRP quantification.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Sample preparation and cleanup methods for clinical top-down proteomics.Expert review of proteomics · 2025Review
- Bioanalytical methods in doping controls: a review.Bioanalysis · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insulin-like growth factor 1 analogues are prohibited in sport for their ability to enhance athletic performance in several sport disciplines. Their detection presents several analytical challenges, mainly due to the minimum required performance limits fixed by the World Anti-Doping Agency. Here, we are presenting analytical workflows to detect IGF-1 and its analogues in different biological matrices. Several off-line immunocapture techniques and protocols were comparatively evaluated. Separation and detection were performed by using standard flow reverse-phase liquid chromatography coupled to a time-of-flight mass spectrometer. The best recoveries were obtained using magnetic beads or pipette tips functionalized with protein A. The analytical workflows were fully validated for qualitative determinations: all the target analytes were clearly distinguishable from the interference of the matrices, with limits of detection and identification in the range of 0.05-0.30 ng/mL in urine and 0.5-2.0 ng/mL in serum/plasma. The extraction efficiency proved to be repeatable (CV% < 10) with recoveries higher than 50%. Intra- and inter-day precision were found to be smaller than 10 and 15%, respectively. The method was successfully applied to the analysis of authentic matrix samples containing the target peptides at the minimum required performance limits, proving that the method developed can be successfully applied to detect and identify IGF-1 analogues for doping control purposes in all the matrices selected. The analytical workflow developed here to detect the target peptides in different matrices can be readily implemented in anti-doping laboratories and has the potential to be adapted for the simultaneous analysis of different similarly sized peptide hormones of doping relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37566232What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.