Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37566227›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2023

Enhanced antibiotic release from bone cement spacers utilizing dual antibiotic loading with elevated vancomycin concentrations in two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection.

Andre Lunz, Mareike Schonhoff, Georg W Omlor, Kevin Knappe, Yannic Bangert, Burkhard Lehner, Tobias Renkawitz, Sebastian Jaeger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. DACBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andre LunzDepartment of Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany. andre.lunz@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5364-1552
Mareike SchonhoffLaboratory of Biomechanics and Implant Research, Department of Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6449-747X
Georg W OmlorCenter for Orthopedics and Joint Replacement, Marienhaus Hospital St. Wendel-Ottweiler, Am Hirschberg 1, 66606, St. Wendel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2259-5482
Kevin KnappeDepartment of Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1632-0941
Yannic BangertDepartment of Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8392-7829
Burkhard LehnerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6776-4801
Tobias RenkawitzDepartment of Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian JaegerLaboratory of Biomechanics and Implant Research, Department of Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7687-6904
Heidelberg University · DESt. Marien Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAntibiotic loaded bone cement spacers provide high local antibiotic concentrations, preserve bone stock, and reduce soft tissue contractions. The objective of this in-vitro study was to compare antibiotic release from spacers, aiming to discover the most optimal preparation and identify modifiable factors that can further enhance antibiotic release.

methodsSix distinct spacer preparation were created using three different bone cements and manual incorporation of antibiotics. During a six-week period, the release of antibiotics from each spacer was measured individually at ten predetermined time points using a chemiluminescent immunoassay.

resultsManually adding 4 g of vancomycin to every 40 g of "Palacos R + G" yielded the most favorable release profile. Throughout all preparations, antibiotic release consistently and significantly decreased over the six-week period. When incorporating a higher concentration of vancomycin, a significantly higher cumulative release of vancomycin was observed, with varying effects on the release of gentamicin. The choice of bone cement had a significant impact on antibiotic release.

conclusionTo enhance antibiotic release from spacers, surgeons should manually incorporate high antibiotic concentrations into the most appropriate bone cement and keep the interim period as short as possible. Specifically, we suggest manual incorporation of 4 g of vancomycin to every 40 g of gentamicin premixed "Palacos R + G" to create bone cement spacers.

Indexed as

Arthritis, InfectiousProsthesis-Related InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone CementsGentamicinsHumansPolymethyl MethacrylateVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone CementsGentamicinsPalacos R+GPolymethyl MethacrylateVancomycindALBCDual antibiotic loaded bone cementPeriprosthetic joint infectionPJISpacerTwo-stage revision

Identifiers

PMID37566227
PMCPMC10602962
OpenAlexW4385751844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.