ArticleUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Patient events in German urology: trend towards hybrid formats?]
Article in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Rates through Better Knowledge? Insights from a Survey among German Medical Students.Urologia internationalis · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient events are an important tool to respond to the increasing need of the public for health information. Through the "patient forum", the German Society of Urology (DGU) is committed to patient information and public relations at its annual congresses. The goal of the study was to evaluate the events from 2017-2019 and to compare them with the first digital patient forum in 2020. MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing a two-page standardized questionnaire, we surveyed the visitors of the presence patient forums (presence group = P) of the three annual congresses of the DGU 2017-2019 as well as the users of the digital event 2020 (online group = O).
resultsWe obtained 71 records for 2017-2019 and 18 for 2020. The median age of visitors was 64 years (range 30-89). Males were 66% (P) vs. 83% (O) of participants (p = 0.005). The offer was rated overall as good to very good by both groups, i.e., 1.6 (P) vs. 1.6 (O; p = 0.7) on a scale from 1 to 6 with 1 being the highest rating. In line with the lower interaction in the digital format, the possibility to ask questions was rated worse with 1.5 (P) vs. 2.8 (O; p = 0.003). When asked about the desired future event format, two-thirds of the users of the digital patient forum were in favor of a hybrid event on-site and online.
conclusionPatient events are suitable means of communication for the public and are rated well by visitors. In particular, interaction with experts is highly valued. Face-to-face formats are associated with a high logistical effort and high costs, and their reach is limited. In the future, hybrid formats could be a reasonable alternative, as they combine the advantages of online and face-to-face formats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.