Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37566157›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2023

Real-World Data of Adherence and Drug Survival of Biologics in Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-experienced Adult Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Vered Rosenberg, Gabriel Chodick, Zhenyi Xue, Freddy Faccin, Howard Amital

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antibiotics for Rheumatologic Diseases: A Critical Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. GD2TNature communications · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vered RosenbergMaccabi Institute for Research and Innovation, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1535-7091
Gabriel ChodickMaccabi Institute for Research and Innovation, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5189-8995
Zhenyi XueAbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA.
Freddy FaccinAbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3535-7152
Howard AmitalFaculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Howard.Amital@sheba.health.gov.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5406-7716

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBiologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatics drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) are important treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). As more of these drugs become available, there is a greater need to assess their real-world adherence and drug survival.

methodsTreatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients with RA who initiated treatment with bDMARDs and tofactinib during 2015-2018 in a large Israeli health maintenance organization were included. Adherence and time to treatment suspension were recorded. Odds for adherence were estimated using a multivariable logistic regression model. Risk for treatment suspension was estimated using a mixed-effect Cox proportional hazard model.

resultsThe analysis included 753 eligible patients (61.8% treatment-naïve) treated with 1287 treatment episodes (tofacitinib 24.2%, tocilizumab 17.5%, etanercept 16.0%, adalimumab 10.4%, abatacept 9.9%, rituximab 9.0%, golimumab 6.9%, certolizumab pegol 3.6%, infliximab 1.9%, and sarilumab 0.5%). Good adherence was measured for almost all drugs, yet over 50% of all treatment episodes were suspended. Older age was associated with reduced risk for treatment suspension while higher number of primary care visits and higher Charlson's comorbidity score were associated with increased risk. Compared to etanercept, treatment with adalimumab, certolizumab, or rituximab was associated with increased risk for treatment suspension (HR 1.68 95% CI 1.27-2.22, HR 1.62 95% CI 1.00-2.60, and HR 2.72 95% CI 2.02-3.67, respectively).

conclusionTreatment choice primarily depends on disease activity and prognosis. Real-world data, showing differences in drug survival of bDMARDs and tsDMARD, can also be used in the variety of considerations when choosing treatment. Future studies could separate patients with RA into subgroups, which would also account for potential drug survival differences and enable personalized therapy.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsAdalimumabAdultCertolizumab PegolEtanerceptHumansMethotrexateRituximabAdalimumabAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsCertolizumab PegolEtanerceptMethotrexateRituximabAdherenceBiologicsDrug survivalReal-worldRheumatoid arthritisTofacitinib

Identifiers

PMID37566157
PMCPMC10499743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.