Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37566144›Full record

SynthesisLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023

Effect of intraoperative anastomotic reinforcement suture on the prevention of anastomotic leakage of double-stapling anastomosis for laparoscopic rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chaoyang Wang, Xiaolong Li, Hao Lin, Jiahua Ju, Haibao Zhang, Yongjiang Yu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chaoyang Wang *Department of Clinical Medicine, The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, No.1 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu Province, China.
Xiaolong Li *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Lanzhou University First Affiliated Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Hao LinDepartment of Clinical Medicine, The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, No.1 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu Province, China.
Jiahua JuDepartment of Clinical Medicine, The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, No.1 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu Province, China.
Haibao ZhangDepartment of Clinical Medicine, The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, No.1 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu Province, China.
Yongjiang YuDepartment of Clinical Medicine, The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, No.1 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu Province, China. ylongy@163.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5025-4047
Lanzhou University · CNFirst Hospital of Lanzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe use of sutures to strengthen the anastomosis after rectal cancer surgery to reduce the possibility of anastomotic leakage has been debated. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the influence of intraoperative anastomotic reinforcing sutures on anastomotic leakage of double-stapling anastomosis for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify literature examining anastomotic leak as the primary outcome to compare studies of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer using the double-stapling anastomosis technique with or without intraoperative anastomotic reinforcement with sutures.

resultsA total of 1122 rectal cancer patients from 5 nonrandomized studies were included in the research. In the combined trial, intraoperative anastomotic reinforcement sutures significantly reduced the incidence of anastomotic leakage in patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.19-0.55; p < 0.0001). With or without intraoperative anastomotic reinforcing sutures, the incidence of postoperative reoperation for anastomotic leak did not differ substantially (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.08-1.21, p = 0.09). Moreover, the surgery was prolonged due to anastomotic reinforcement with sutures (OR, 6.64; 95% CI, - 6.18 to 19.47, p = 0.31).

conclusionsIntraoperative anastomotic reinforcement with sutures may be associated with a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage. The amount of research evidence is limited because most of the studies analyzed did not include patients with factors such as neoadjuvant therapy or prophylactic stomas. Therefore, additional multicenter randomized controlled studies with larger size samples are needed to support the validity of the approach.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRectal NeoplasmsAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRisk FactorsSuturesAnastomotic leakLaparoscopyRectal neoplasmsSutures

Identifiers

PMID37566144
OpenAlexW4385751178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.