Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37565988›Full record

ArticleSICOT-J2023

Effect of fracture level on the residual fracture gap during tibial intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures.

Kutalmis Albayrak, Abdulhamit Misir, Yakup Alpay, Abdul Fettah Buyuk, Evren Akpinar, Sukru Sarper Gursu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SICOT-J, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nailing approach and residual fracture gap: A comparative study of antegrade versus retrograde fixation in distal femoral shaft fractures.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kutalmis AlbayrakUniversity of Health Sciences Baltalimani Bone Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 34470 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-8427-8856
Abdulhamit MisirPrivate Safa Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 34194 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5270-1429
Yakup AlpayBahçeşehir University, Vm Medical Park Maltepe Hospital, 34846 Istanbul, Turkey.
Abdul Fettah BuyukUniversity of Missouri, Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia, MO 65201, USA.
Evren AkpinarUniversity of Health Sciences Baltalimani Bone Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 34470 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0702-289X
Sukru Sarper GursuProfessor, University of Health Sciences Baltalimani Bone Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 34470 Istanbul, Turkey.
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRBahçeşehir University · TRSema Hospital · TRUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe development of fracture gap during intramedullary nailing in tibial fractures is associated with poor fracture fragment contact and increased time to union and complications. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the fracture level in the development of the fracture gap and the effect of the fracture gap on pain, radiologic and functional outcomes, and complication rate. MATERIAL AND

methodA total of 45 patients who underwent reamed intramedullary nailing due to closed transverse or short oblique tibial shaft fractures were divided into the proximal fracture group and the distal fracture group. The correlations between the visual analog scale (VAS) score, modified radiograph union score for tibias (RUST), and postoperative 1-year lower extremity functional scale scores, residual fracture gap, and time to union were evaluated.

resultsThe mean fracture gap amounts in the immediate postoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were 5.6 ± 1.7 and 6.0 ± 1.7 mm in proximal fractures and 0.3 ± 2.4 mm and 0.4 ± 2.3 mm in distal fractures, respectively (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The mean time to union was 21.9 ± 2.9 weeks in the proximal fracture group and 16.7 ± 2.4 weeks in the distal fracture group (p < 0.000). The residual fracture gap amount significantly correlated with the level of fracture (r = 0.811, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Tibial shaft fractures proximal to the isthmus level tend to develop significantly larger fracture gaps than distal fractures. It is associated with increased time to union and radiographic union scores as well as slightly higher complication and reoperation rates.

Indexed as

Fracture gapFracture levelIntramedullary nailingTibia shaft fracturesUnion

Identifiers

PMID37565988
PMCPMC10416760
OpenAlexW4385751671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.