Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37565793›Full record

ReviewThe Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology2023

Modeling the Health Economic Burden of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Turkey: Cost-Effectiveness of Targeted Screening.

Ayhan Hilmi Çekin, Rahmet Güner, Ahmet Çağkan İnkaya, Dilek Oğuz, Oktay Özdemir, Ömer Fehmi Tabak

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Real-Life Experience of Hepatitis C Treatment with Direct-Acting Antivirals in Genotypes 2 and 3.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ayhan Hilmi ÇekinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Health Sciences University Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Rahmet GünerDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ahmet Çağkan İnkayaDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Dilek OğuzDepartment of Gastroenterology, Güven Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Oktay ÖzdemirDepartment of Medical Education, İstanbul Health and Technology University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ömer Fehmi TabakDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, İstanbul University Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Güven Hospital · TRHacettepe University · TRIstanbul University · TRIstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TRMinistry of Health · TRSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsIn 2016, World Health Organization introduced global goals to eliminate hepatitis C virus by 2030. The aim of this study is to analyze the epidemiologic and economic burden of hepatitis C virus in Turkey and compare current practice (regular care) with a hypothetical active screening and treatment approach (active scenario). MATERIALS AND

methodsA Markov model was used to analyze and compare regular care with a scenario developed by experts including the screening and treatment of all acute and chronic hepatitis C virus infections between 2020 and 2050. General and targeted populations were focused. The model reflected the natural history of the disease, and the inputs were based on a literature review and expert opinions. Costs were provided by previous studies and national regulations.

resultsThe active scenario resulted in higher spending for all groups compared with regular care in the first year. Cumulative costs were equalized in the 8th, 12th, 13th, and 16th year and followed by cost-savings of 49.7 million, 1.1 billion, 288.6 million, and 883.4 million Turkish liras in 20 years for prisoners, refugees, people who inject drugs (PWID), and all population, respectively. In all groups, the mortality was found to be lower with the active scenario. In total, 62.8% and 50.6% of expected deaths with regular care in 5 and 20 years, respectively, were prevented with the active scenario.

conclusionsAn active screening and treatment approach for hepatitis C virus infection could be cost-effective for PWID, prisoners, and refugees. Almost two-thirds of deaths in regular care could be prevented in 5 years' time with this approach.

Indexed as

Hepatitis CHepatitis C, ChronicSubstance Abuse, IntravenousAntiviral AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisFinancial StressHepacivirusHumansTurkeyAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID37565793
PMCPMC10645295
OpenAlexW4385752298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.