Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37565788›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2023

Implementing medical abortion through telemedicine in Colombia: a qualitative study.

Nora Piay-Fernández, Emma Stenbacka, Mariana Calderón Jaramillo, Giovanni Guerrero, Alejandro Antonio Solano Rodríguez, Paola Montenegro, Diana Carolina Moreno, Amanda Cleeve

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nora Piay-FernándezMaster's Student, Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Emma StenbackaResident Doctor in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Danderyd Hospital, Danderyd, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0008-7384-1894
Mariana Calderón JaramilloQualitative Research Assistant, Profamilia, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-2722-6590
Giovanni GuerreroDirector of Clinical Management and Quality, Profamilia, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-3186-4859
Alejandro Antonio Solano RodríguezNational Coordinator of PAEND Programme, Profamilia, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0009-0001-1185-949X
Paola MontenegroDirector of Research, Profamilia, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0009-0001-8681-8326
Diana Carolina MorenoDirector of Advocacy, Profamilia, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0009-0002-4156-2483
Amanda CleevePostdoctoral Researcher, Department of Global Public Health, and Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8115-5503

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The non-governmental organisation Profamilia developed and implemented medical abortion through telemedicine in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. This service is now integrated as an alternative to in-person care and available to abortion-seekers across Colombia. Previous research has emphasised bottlenecks in abortion provision, but less is known about implementation processes and experiences. We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of telemedicine for medical abortion from the perspectives of key informants involved in the implementation in Colombia. We conducted 15 in-depth interviews with healthcare professionals, coordinators and support staff implementing telemedicine for medical abortion in the early phase of implementation, between March and October 2021. We analysed the data using the framework method and applied the normalisation process theory in our analysis and interpretation of findings. Our findings show that strong leadership, organisational efforts on pre-implementation training, monitoring and evaluation, and collaboration between diversely skilled and experienced providers are essential for successful implementation. Participants were generally positive towards the use of telemedicine for medical abortion; concerns related to effectiveness, safety and safeguarding existed mainly among providers with less clinical experience. We identified contextual barriers, such as social opposition, regulatory barriers, providers' unavailability, and poor phone and internet connections in rural areas, which impacted the feasibility of the intervention negatively. In conclusion, to ensure stakeholders' buy-in and for the service to reach all abortion seekers in need, future implementation endeavours must address concerns about safety and effectiveness, and tackle identified contexual barriers.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedCOVID-19TelemedicineColombiaFemaleHumansPandemicsPregnancyacceptabilityColombiafeasibilityhealthcare providerimplementation sciencemedical abortionservice deliverytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37565788
PMCPMC10424593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.