Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37565532›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2023

Strong Purifying Selection in Haploid Tissue-Specific Genes of Scots Pine Supports the Masking Theory.

Sandra Cervantes, Robert Kesälahti, Timo A Kumpula, Tiina M Mattila, Heikki Helanterä, Tanja Pyhäjärvi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandra CervantesDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0793-5784
Robert KesälahtiDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2694-7302
Timo A KumpulaBiocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6124-8929
Tiina M MattilaHuman Evolution, Department of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1298-7370
Heikki HelanteräDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6468-5956
Tanja PyhäjärviDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6958-5172
University of Oulu · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FIUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The masking theory states that genes expressed in a haploid stage will be under more efficient selection. In contrast, selection will be less efficient in genes expressed in a diploid stage, where the fitness effects of recessive deleterious or beneficial mutations can be hidden from selection in heterozygous form. This difference can influence several evolutionary processes such as the maintenance of genetic variation, adaptation rate, and genetic load. Masking theory expectations have been confirmed in single-cell haploid and diploid organisms. However, in multicellular organisms, such as plants, the effects of haploid selection are not clear-cut. In plants, the great majority of studies indicating haploid selection have been carried out using male haploid tissues in angiosperms. Hence, evidence in these systems is confounded with the effects of sexual selection and intraspecific competition. Evidence from other plant groups is scarce, and results show no support for the masking theory. Here, we have used a gymnosperm Scots pine megagametophyte, a maternally derived seed haploid tissue, and four diploid tissues to test the strength of purifying selection on a set of genes with tissue-specific expression. By using targeted resequencing data of those genes, we obtained estimates of genetic diversity, the site frequency spectrum of 0-fold and 4-fold sites, and inferred the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations in haploid and diploid tissue-specific genes. Our results show that purifying selection is stronger for tissue-specific genes expressed in the haploid megagametophyte tissue and that this signal of strong selection is not an artifact driven by high expression levels.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSelection, GeneticDiploidyHaploidyMutationPlantsDFEgymnospermshaploid selectionmasking theoryPinus sylvestrispurifying selection

Identifiers

PMID37565532
PMCPMC10457172
OpenAlexW4385751823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.