ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2023
A multiplexed plant-animal SNP array for selective breeding and species conservation applications.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a dual-purpose 60K single nucleotide polymorphism chip for simultaneous genotyping of chicken and duck.Animal bioscience · 2026Article
- Machine learning for genomic prediction of growth traits in aquaculture: a case study of the Australasian snapper (Chrysophrys auratus).BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- RADseq datasets of native beans from Mexico.Data in brief · 2024Article
- Pitfalls of multi-species SNP arrays introducing new forms of ascertainment bias.The plant genome · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable and high-throughput genotyping platforms are of immense importance for identifying and dissecting genomic regions controlling important phenotypes, supporting selection processes in breeding programs, and managing wild populations and germplasm collections. Amongst available genotyping tools, single nucleotide polymorphism arrays have been shown to be comparatively easy to use and generate highly accurate genotypic data. Single-species arrays are the most commonly used type so far; however, some multi-species arrays have been developed for closely related species that share single nucleotide polymorphism markers, exploiting inter-species cross-amplification. In this study, the suitability of a multiplexed plant-animal single nucleotide polymorphism array, including both closely and distantly related species, was explored. The performance of the single nucleotide polymorphism array across species for diverse applications, ranging from intra-species diversity assessments to parentage analysis, was assessed. Moreover, the value of genotyping pooled DNA of distantly related species on the single nucleotide polymorphism array as a technique to further reduce costs was evaluated. Single nucleotide polymorphism performance was generally high, and species-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms proved suitable for diverse applications. The multi-species single nucleotide polymorphism array approach reported here could be transferred to other species to achieve cost savings resulting from the increased throughput when several projects use the same array, and the pooling technique adds another highly promising advancement to additionally decrease genotyping costs by half.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.