Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37565181›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Metoprolol or Verapamil in the Management of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review.

Maher Taha, Purva Dahat, Stacy Toriola, Travis Satnarine, Zareen Zohara, Ademiniyi Adelekun, Kofi D Seffah, Korlos Salib, Lana Dardari, Ana P Arcia Franchini

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maher TahaInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Purva DahatInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Stacy ToriolaPathology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Travis SatnarinePediatrics, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Zareen ZoharaInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Ademiniyi AdelekunFamily Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Kofi D SeffahInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Korlos SalibInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Lana DardariInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Ana P Arcia FranchiniResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common genetic heart disease and is a prevalent cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD). This study aims to establish the benefits and therapeutic value metoprolol or verapamil offer to patients who suffer from symptoms caused by HCM, with regard to resolving left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO), as well as improving a patient's quality of life and reducing symptoms. We conducted a systematic review to find clinical studies that described the use of metoprolol or verapamil in the management of HCM. Three databases were analyzed for studies, PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. We discovered 6,260 potentially eligible records across all the databases. According to our eligibility criteria, we included four studies in this review. Metoprolol showed median left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradients of 25 mm Hg versus 72 mm Hg (P = 0.007) at rest, 28 mm Hg versus 62 mm Hg (P < 0.001) at peak exercise, and 45 mm Hg versus 115 mm Hg (P < 0.001) post-exercise. Verapamil also showed a statistically significant increase in exercise capacity. Both drugs have been shown to be safe to use with a good side effect profile; however, metoprolol was better tolerated in the patient population that was tested in the studies collected. In this study, metoprolol was effective in reducing LVOT and improving the quality of life in patients, while verapamil showed variable effects on both exercise capacity and baseline hemodynamics.

Indexed as

beta-blockerscalcium channel blockershocmleft ventricular outflow obstructionmetoprololsudden cardiac death (scd)verapamil

Identifiers

PMID37565181
PMCPMC10411313
OpenAlexW4385706909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.