Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37565093›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

The Quality of Discharge Summaries at Al-Shaab Hospital, Sudan, in 2022: The First Cycle of a Clinical Audit.

Abdullatif Yasir H Eissa, Ahmed Zaki W Mohamed Elhassan, Almothanna Zaki H Ahmed, Ammar Elgadi, Gaffar Alemam A Manhal, Mohamed H Fadul, Mohamed Ishag Ahmed, Abdalla Fadul, Islah Ismail Mekki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abdullatif Yasir H EissaFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, SDN.
Ahmed Zaki W Mohamed ElhassanFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, SDN.
Almothanna Zaki H AhmedFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, SDN.
Ammar ElgadiFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, SDN.
Gaffar Alemam A ManhalFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, SDN.
Mohamed H FadulFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, SDN.
Mohamed Ishag AhmedFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, SDN.
Abdalla FadulDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Islah Ismail MekkiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Al-Shaab Teaching Hospital, Khartoum, SDN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The discharge summary is a vital component of the modern health system. It is defined as a synopsis of information regarding events occurring during the inpatient care of a patient, to allow for a safe, quick, and effective patient-centered discharge process. It contains important information about the patient's hospital stay, including the reason for admission, treatment received, and follow-up needed. Low-quality discharge summaries pose a great risk to patient healthcare since the most frequent reason for error in clinical settings is poor communication. In the United Kingdom, the Professional Record Standards Body (PRSB) has adopted the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AoMRC) "Standards for the Clinical Structure and Content of Patient Records" and produced a standard discharge summary form. This study aimed to assess the quality of discharge summaries at Al-Shaab Hospital in Sudan in terms of information, filling adequacy, and adherence to international guidelines and evaluate the discharge interviews. Methods A cross-sectional institution-based study was conducted in the period of September to December 2022 at Al-Shaab Teaching Hospital in Khartoum, Sudan. Systematic random sampling was used to select the study participants from the discharged patients. A total of 70 patients were met in their wards over a period of two months, and the contents of their discharge cards were compared to items on an online checklist based on the Professional Record Standards Body (PRSB) and the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AoMRC) standard discharge summary. The patients were also interviewed to assess their knowledge regarding their discharge information. Results The hospital's discharge summary form contained only four headings: date, patient name, age, and ID number. The assessed cards were found to be missing valuable information, including date of admission (missing in 83%), filling doctor's name (missing in 71%), and medication changes (missing in 70%). Only half of the summaries were clearly readable. The majority of patients had poor knowledge regarding their medication side effects (89%) and how to act in an emergency (86%), while knowledge of medication doses and follow-up details was good in 80% and 66%, respectively. Conclusion The patients are discharged with inadequately filled discharge forms. This may be due to the poor design of the form, so a newly designed form will be proposed, based on international standards. The discharge interview is also in need of improvement, to make sure patients are fully aware of their condition.

Indexed as

clinical auditdischarge counselingdischarge interviewdischarge summaryhospital dischargepatient dischargequality improvementsudan

Identifiers

PMID37565093
PMCPMC10410477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.