ArticleCureus2023
Factors Associated With an Increased Risk of Facial Malformations.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of maternal systemic diseases on the occurrence of cleft lip and palate in newborns: a narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Facial anomalies comprise a significant component of birth defects, with oral clefts being the second most common entity in this group. All organ systems within the body can be affected by congenital anomalies, mostly affecting the musculoskeletal system. Birth defects are among the leading causes of infant mortality and morbidity around the world. Objectives To find the factors associated with an increased risk of facial malformations so that steps for improving preventive measures can be taken. Methodology This was a cross-sectional study in which the data were collected from the files of infants admitted to the pediatric department. Data regarding the type of congenital anomaly, maternal investigations done during pregnancy, maternal history of medication, diabetes, hypertension, radiation exposure, smoking, and alcohol history, and family history of congenital anomalies was collected from the files of neonates and from the pediatrician. In the case of unanswered questions, the parent was contacted after 10 days with their consent. Results Of the sample size of 259 children (males: 132; females: 127), 68 (26%) had a cleft lip, 69 (27%) had a cleft palate, 110 (42%) had both cleft lip and palate, five (2%) had a cleft lip with nasal deformity, five (2%) had a cleft lip and palate with nasal deformity, and two (1%) had hypertelorism. Eight percent of neonates with craniofacial malformations had a family history of congenital malformations; 80.7% of neonates had a history of parental consanguinity; and 19.3% were unrelated. In regard to the mothers, 41.3% of the mothers had diabetes, 4% had hypertension, 4% had both gestational diabetes and hypertension, and 55% had neither of these diseases. Of the 55% of mothers with neither disease, 75% were married to their cousins, while 25% were not married within the family. Practical implications This study, highlighting the major factors contributing to the incidence of congenital facial malformations, will educate the community and establish awareness among the younger generation of the top causes of anomalies, therefore making a huge impact on increasing efforts to reduce the prevalence of congenital anomalies. Conclusion Defects of both the cleft lip and palate had the highest prevalence of facial malformations among study subjects (110 patients (42%)). Parental consanguinity is one of the leading factors associated with an increased risk of facial malformations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.