Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37564874›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2023

Comparative analysis of full-length 16s ribosomal RNA genome sequencing in human fecal samples using primer sets with different degrees of degeneracy.

Christian Waechter, Leon Fehse, Marius Welzel, Dominik Heider, Lek Babalija, Juan Cheko, Julian Mueller, Jochen Pöling, Thomas Braun, Sabine Pankuweit and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Establishment of an Indigenous-Led Drinking Water Monitoring Program Leveraging qPCR and Metagenomics Testing in New Zealand.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The prevalence and distribution ofFrontiers in microbiomes · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christian WaechterDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Leon FehseDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Marius WelzelDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Dominik HeiderDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Lek BabalijaDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Juan ChekoDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Julian MuellerDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Jochen PölingMax Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Thomas BraunMax Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Sabine PankuweitDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Eberhard WeiheInstitute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical Faculty, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Ralf KinscherfInstitute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical Faculty, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Bernhard SchiefferDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Ulrich LuesebrinkDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Muhidien SoufiDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Volker RuppertDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Philipps University of Marburg · DEMax Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing has revolutionized the field of microbiology research and greatly expanded our knowledge of complex bacterial communities. Nanopore sequencing provides distinct advantages, combining cost-effectiveness, ease of use, high throughput, and high taxonomic resolution through its ability to process long amplicons, such as the entire 16s rRNA genome. We examine the performance of the conventional 27F primer (27F-I) included in the 16S Barcoding Kit distributed by Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) and that of a more degenerate 27F primer (27F-II) in the context of highly complex bacterial communities in 73 human fecal samples. The results show striking differences in both taxonomic diversity and relative abundance of a substantial number of taxa between the two primer sets. Primer 27F-I reveals a significantly lower biodiversity and, for example, at the taxonomic level of the phyla, a dominance of

Indexed as

16S rRNAgut microbiomehuman fecal microbiomeMinION Mk1Cnanopore sequencingnext-generation sequencing (NGS)oxford nanopore technologies (ONT)primer degeneracy

Identifiers

PMID37564874
PMCPMC10411958
OpenAlexW4385318947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.