ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
Clinical evaluation of preoperative three -item questionnaire and pain experienced on infiltration of local anesthetics to predict severity of acute pain after caesarean section.
Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting the Severity of Acute Pain after Cesarean Delivery: A Narrative Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Several studies have attempted to identify patients at risk of developing severe pain after caesarean section (CS) by utilizing preoperative experimental pain application and clinical tests. The three-item questionnaire and reported pain intensity on infiltration of local anesthetic (LA) on the back of patient just before administration of spinal anesthesia, are two simple tests previously shown to be promising. We aimed to study utility of these two tools in Indian patients undergoing CS and find their correlation with postoperative pain and analgesic consumption. Material and Methods: A total of 150 parturients undergoing elective CS were enrolled. Preoperatively patients were asked to rate their level of anxiety, anticipated postoperative pain and analgesic need after surgery (three-item questionnaire). The pain intensity reported by patient upon LA injection for spinal anesthesia were recorded. In the postoperative period, pain intensity at rest, evoked pain and need for rescue analgesics were recorded. The correlation between three item questionnaire and pain on LA infiltration to postoperative pain were evaluated. To see relationship between the predictor variables to outcome, a multiple regression analysis was performed. Results: The predictors variables and postoperative pain were found to have mild correlation (r = 0.124 to 0.239). The predictor variables were significantly correlated with postoperative pain at rest but their association was not significant to evoked pain intensity. Multiple regression analysis showed that change in the predictors explains only 7-8% variance in postoperative pain outcomes. Conclusion: The three -item questionnaire and pain intensity reported upon LA infiltration for spinal anesthesia have mild correlation to postoperative pain in Indian parturients undergoing CS. As these variables predicts only 8% variance in pain experienced after CS, further studies are required for accurate prediction and targeted treatment of post CS pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.