Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37564828›Full record

ArticleBMJ medicine2023

Genetically proxied lean mass and risk of Alzheimer's disease: mendelian randomisation study.

Iyas Daghlas, Malik Nassan, Dipender Gill

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetically proxied blood pressure, vascular brain injury, and Alzheimer's disease pathology.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Iyas DaghlasDepartment of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6924-0641
Malik NassanMesulam Center for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Dipender GillDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7312-7078
Northwestern University · USNovo Nordisk (Denmark) · DKUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether genetically proxied lean mass is associated with risk of Alzheimer's disease. Design: Mendelian randomisation study. Setting: The UK Biobank study and genome wide association study meta-analyses of Alzheimer's disease and cognitive performance. Participants: Summary level genetic data from: 450 243 UK Biobank participants with impedance measures of lean mass and fat mass; an independent sample of 21 982 patients with Alzheimer's disease and 41 944 controls without Alzheimer's disease; a replication sample of 7329 patients with Alzheimer's disease and 252 879 controls; and 269 867 individuals taking part in a genome wide association study of cognitive performance. Main outcome measure: Effect of genetically proxied lean mass on the risk of Alzheimer's disease, and the related phenotype of cognitive performance. Results: An increase in genetically proxied appendicular lean mass of one standard deviation was associated with a 12% reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 0.95, P=0.001). This finding was replicated in an independent cohort of patients with Alzheimer's disease (0.91, 0.83 to 0.99, P=0.02) and was consistent in sensitivity analyses that are more robust to the inclusion of pleiotropic variants. Higher genetically proxied appendicular lean mass was also associated with increased cognitive performance (standard deviation increase in cognitive performance for each standard deviation increase in appendicular lean mass 0.09, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.11, P=0.001), and adjusting for potential mediation through genetically proxied cognitive performance did not reduce the association between appendicular lean mass and risk of Alzheimer's disease. Similar results were found for the outcomes of Alzheimer's disease and cognitive performance when the risk factors of genetically proxied trunk lean mass and whole body lean mass were used, respectively, adjusted for genetically proxied fat mass. Conclusions: These findings suggest that lean mass might be a possible modifiable protective factor for Alzheimer's disease. The mechanisms underlying this finding, as well as the clinical and public health implications, warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

DementiaEpidemiologyGeneticsNeurology

Identifiers

PMID37564828
PMCPMC10410880
OpenAlexW4382600908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.