Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37564714›Full record

ArticleArchives of plastic surgery2023

Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications of Pedicled Latissimus Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Emanuela C Peshel, Claire M McNary, Catherine Barkach, Elizabeth M Boudiab, Daniella Vega, Farid Nossoni, Kongkrit Chaiyasate, Jeremy M Powers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of plastic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. AME case reports · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emanuela C PeshelDivision of General Surgery, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0001-9552-551X
Claire M McNaryDepartment of Surgery, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Auburn Hills, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0003-3057-9765
Catherine BarkachDepartment of Surgery, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Auburn Hills, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0001-9370-1591
Elizabeth M BoudiabDivision of General Surgery, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-1162-7568
Daniella VegaDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-2448-5116
Farid NossoniDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0003-2157-2078
Kongkrit ChaiyasateDepartment of Surgery, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Auburn Hills, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0003-3825-6784
Jeremy M PowersDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee.ORCID 0000-0002-4973-9952
Beaumont Health · USOakland University · USEast Tennessee State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is a reliable option for breast reconstruction. This is particularly true in patients with contraindications to abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction. A systematic review of patient satisfaction and health related quality of life following LD breast reconstruction using the BREAST-Q survey was conducted. The scope of the review was to determine the degree of patient satisfaction following the procedure and to examine how patient satisfaction from the pedicled LD flap compares to other breast reconstructive procedures. A literature search on BREAST-Q in LD flap reconstruction was performed. Only articles written in English and in published peer-reviewed journals were included. Studies with less than 20 patients in their sample and those with a follow-up period of less than 1 year were excluded. Five articles representing 331 patients were reviewed, including one case-control study and four retrospective cohort studies. Level of evidence was either III (4) or IV (1). The average age was 53 with average body mass index of 25. Most reconstructions were delayed (67%) and unilateral (88%), and most patients required radiation (79%). The average length of follow-up was 36 months, and the response rate was 75%. Overall, patients who underwent LD flap reconstruction reported favorable outcomes in satisfaction domains and quality of life domains with few complications. A meta-analysis also demonstrated higher satisfaction in LD flap without implants compared with LD flap with implants. Patient-reported outcomes following LD breast reconstruction compare favorably with other techniques of breast reconstruction.

Indexed as

BREAST-Qbreast reconstructionlatissimus dorsi flappatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID37564714
PMCPMC10411213
OpenAlexW4322764312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.