Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37564633›Full record

ArticleAcute medicine & surgery

Onlinization of a simulation course that includes minor emergency procedures.

Tomoyasu Matsubara, Kenji Numata, Takashi Inaba, Tetsuhiro Maeno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tomoyasu MatsubaraDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience and Therapeutics Hiroshima University, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences Kasumi, Minami-ku Hiroshima Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7559-8284
Kenji NumataDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kawasaki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9813-5592
Takashi InabaDepartment of Family Medicine, General Practice and Community Health Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba Tsukuba Japan.
Tetsuhiro MaenoDepartment of Primary Care and Medical Education Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba Tsukuba Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: We attempted to convert a simulation course held on-site for primary care physicians to learn about the initial treatment of minor emergencies, including some common surgical procedures, to an online format. Methods: We reviewed the subjects covered in the course and evaluated whether it was "decision-making" or "technical skills" that had been primarily taught as simulation-based training for each subject, and then supplemented the contents accordingly. Results: As a result, satisfaction levels with the online course were comparable to those with the on-site course as measured by a postcourse questionnaire (97.6% [83/85 participants] rating it as "excellent" or "good" on a 5-point Likert scale postcourse questionnaire). Conclusion: We showed that it is reasonable to offer simulation in place of in-person training even for some procedures that were once assumed to be difficult to teach online. Of note, the online course is not just a replacement for the on-site course; it can offer other benefits, including opportunities for those who have difficulty attending courses due to distance or work-related reasons. After the COVID-19 pandemic period, both onsite and online courses can be held, allowing participants to choose the style of course that best suits their situation.

Indexed as

educationERtrauma

Identifiers

PMID37564633
PMCPMC10410122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.