Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37564426›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Public health palliative care interventions that enable communities to support people who are dying and their carers: a scoping review of studies that assess person-centered outcomes.

Anna Peeler, Alexandra Doran, Lee Winter-Dean, Mueed Ijaz, Molly Brittain, Lorraine Hansford, Katrina Wyatt, Libby Sallnow, Richard Harding

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna PeelerCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy, and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alexandra DoranGKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lee Winter-DeanCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy, and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mueed IjazGKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Molly BrittainCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy, and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lorraine HansfordWellcome Centre for Cultures and Environments of Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Katrina WyattDepartment of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Libby SallnowSt Christopher's Hospice, London, United Kingdom.
Richard HardingCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy, and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Cicely Saunders International · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBKing's College London · GBKing's College School · GBVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-UWellcome Trust 203109/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Public health palliative care views communities as an integral part of care delivery at the end of life. This community-provider partnership approach has the potential to improve end-of-life care for people who are dying and their carers. Objective: To identify and appraise the current literature related to public health interventions that enable communities to support people who are dying and their carers. Methods: A scoping review was conducted, applying Arksey and O'Malley's methods. Data was extracted and synthesized using narrative techniques, and results are reported using PRISMA guidelines. Results: The search yielded 2,902 results. Eighteen met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Interventions were categorized according to their target population: people with life-limiting illness (ex. facilitated social interaction, helplines and guided discussions about death and dying); carers (ex. social support mapping, psychoeducation, and community resource identification and facilitation); or dyads (ex. reminiscence activities, practical and emotional support from volunteers, online modules to bolster coping mechanisms). Public health palliative care approaches were delivered by key community stakeholders such as community health workers, volunteers, peer mentors, and pre-established support groups. Despite reported challenges in identifying appropriate tools to measure effectiveness, studies report improvement in quality of life, loneliness, social support, stress and self-efficacy. Conclusion: We found that community-engaged palliative care interventions can lead to appreciable changes in various outcomes, though it was difficult to determine in which contexts this approach works best because of the dearth of contextual information reported. Based on the varied design and implementation strategies, it is clear that no one method for enhancing end of life care will benefit all communities and it is crucial to engage community members at all stages of the design and implementation process. Future research should be grounded in appropriate theory, describe contextual differences in these communities, and should specifically examine how demographics, resource availability, and social capital might impact the design, implementation, and results of public health palliative care interventions.

Indexed as

Palliative CareTerminal CareCaregiversHumansPublic HealthQuality of Lifecommunity engagedend-of-lifeinterventionspalliative carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID37564426
PMCPMC10410270
OpenAlexW4385289125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.