Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37564106›Full record

ArticleJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health2023

Natural Language Processing for Large-Scale Analysis of Eczema and Psoriasis Social Media Comments.

Jack A Cummins, Guohai Zhou, Vinod E Nambudiri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Natural language processing in dermatology: A systematic literature review and state of the art.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jack A CumminsManchester Essex Regional High School, Manchester, MA.
Guohai ZhouDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Vinod E NambudiriDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media tools are widely used by dermatologic patients. Eczema and psoriasis, two of the most common inflammatory skin diseases, are well-represented on the social media site Reddit. We used natural language processing tools to examine comments in subreddits r/psoriasis and r/eczema (combined user base >187,000), tracking commenters' interest levels and sentiments related to common treatments for psoriasis and eczema as well as discussions of adverse drug reactions. All comments from 2014-2020 from the subreddits r/eczema (n = 196,571) and r/psoriasis (n = 123,144) were retrieved and processed using natural language processing tools. Comment volume in r/eczema related to antibacterial therapies, lifestyle changes, and prednisone decreased from 2014-2020, whereas phototherapy comments remained stable, and dupilumab comment volume increased. Comment volume in r/psoriasis for newer therapeutics (including biologics and apremilast) increased after Food and Drug Administration approval, whereas older therapies such as etanercept, adalimumab, and methotrexate decreased over time. Sentiment scores tended to decrease in the years after Food and Drug Administration approval. Among psoriasis treatments, calcipotriene and branded calcipotriene/betamethasone foam had the highest sentiment, whereas apremilast had the lowest overall sentiment score. These analyses also identified changes in patient interest levels and sentiment related to eczema and psoriasis treatments, suggesting an area for additional research.

Identifiers

PMID37564106
PMCPMC10410170
OpenAlexW4377104863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.