Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37564098›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023

Performance of alternative manual and automated deep learning segmentation techniques for the prediction of benign and malignant lung nodules.

Heather M Selby, Pritam Mukherjee, Christopher Parham, Sachin B Malik, Olivier Gevaert, Sandy Napel, Rajesh P Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Heather M SelbyStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics (BMIR), Stanford, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1574-3929
Pritam MukherjeeNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9975-9994
Christopher ParhamVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States.
Sachin B MalikVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States.
Olivier GevaertStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics (BMIR), Stanford, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9965-5466
Sandy NapelStanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6876-5507
Rajesh P ShahVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4916-1377

Funding

Informatics Tools for Optimized Imaging Biomarkers for Cancer Research&DiscoveryU24CA180927 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KALPATHY-CRAMER, JAYASHREE, ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
Multi-scale modeling of glioma for the prediction of treatment response, treatment monitoring and treatment allocationR01CA260271 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GEVAERT, OLIVIER · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA260271NCI NIH HHS U24 CA180927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We aim to evaluate the performance of radiomic biopsy (RB), best-fit bounding box (BB), and a deep-learning-based segmentation method called no-new-U-Net (nnU-Net), compared to the standard full manual (FM) segmentation method for predicting benign and malignant lung nodules using a computed tomography (CT) radiomic machine learning model. Materials and Methods: A total of 188 CT scans of lung nodules from 2 institutions were used for our study. One radiologist identified and delineated all 188 lung nodules, whereas a second radiologist segmented a subset ( Results: For the delineation of the FM, RB, and BB segmentations, the two radiologists required a median time (IQR) of 113 (54 to 251.5), 21 (9.25 to 38), and 16 (12 to 64.25) s, respectively ( Conclusion: Radiomic biopsy-based models outperformed FM and BB models in prediction of benign and malignant lung nodules in two independent datasets while deep-learning segmentation-based models performed similarly to FM and BB. RB could be a more efficient segmentation method, but further validation is needed.

Indexed as

computed tomography imagingdeep learninglung nodulesmachine learningradiomicssegmentation

Identifiers

PMID37564098
PMCPMC10411216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.