Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37564070›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2023

Impact of major awards on the subsequent work of their recipients.

Andrew Nepomuceno, Hilary Bayer, John P A Ioannidis

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew NepomucenoMeta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS) (AN, HB, JPAI) and Departments of Epidemiology and Population Health (AN, JPAI) and of Medicine (JPAI), Stanford University, Stanford, 94305-6104, USA.
Hilary BayerMeta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS) (AN, HB, JPAI) and Departments of Epidemiology and Population Health (AN, JPAI) and of Medicine (JPAI), Stanford University, Stanford, 94305-6104, USA.
John P A IoannidisMeta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS) (AN, HB, JPAI) and Departments of Epidemiology and Population Health (AN, JPAI) and of Medicine (JPAI), Stanford University, Stanford, 94305-6104, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3118-6859

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To characterize the impact of major research awards on recipients' subsequent work, we studied Nobel Prize winners in Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, and Physics and MacArthur Fellows working in scientific fields. Using a case-crossover design, we compared scientists' citations, publications and citations-per-publication from work published in a 3-year pre-award period to their work published in a 3-year post-award period. Nobel Laureates and MacArthur Fellows received fewer citations for post- than for pre-award work. This was driven mostly by Nobel Laureates. Median decrease was 80.5 citations among Nobel Laureates (

Indexed as

awardsbibliometricsresearch incentives

Identifiers

PMID37564070
PMCPMC10410203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.