ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
A deep learning model for predicting COVID-19 ARDS in critically ill patients.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07328997 (Exploration of Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Prediction Models for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Based on Radiographic Evaluations Assessed by Artificial Intelligence), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Exploration of Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Prediction Models for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Based on Radiographic Evaluations Assessed by Artificial Intelligence
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive Modeling of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using Machine Learning: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Accuracy of artificial intelligence algorithms in predicting acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Computed tomography in ARDS, from morphological insights to AI-powered multi-modal analysis: a narrative review.Journal of intensive care · 2026Review
- Machine learning in ARDS: an intensivist's guide to artificial intelligence applications.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Current Insights into Clinical, Molecular, and Therapeutic Approaches to Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in acute respiratory distress syndrome management: recent advances.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Development and validation of a deep learning-based framework for automated lung CT segmentation and acute respiratory distress syndrome prediction: a multicenter cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute infectious pneumonia caused by a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection previously unknown to humans. However, predictive studies of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with COVID-19 are limited. In this study, we attempted to establish predictive models to predict ARDS caused by COVID-19 via a thorough analysis of patients' clinical data and CT images. Method: The data of included patients were retrospectively collected from the intensive care unit in our hospital from April 2022 to June 2022. The primary outcome was the development of ARDS after ICU admission. We first established two individual predictive models based on extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and convolutional neural network (CNN), respectively; then, an integrated model was developed by combining the two individual models. The performance of all the predictive models was evaluated using the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), confusion matrix, and calibration plot. Results: A total of 103 critically ill COVID-19 patients were included in this research, of which 23 patients (22.3%) developed ARDS after admission; five predictive variables were selected and further used to establish the machine learning models, and the XGBoost model yielded the most accurate predictions with the highest AUC (0.94, 95% CI: 0.91-0.96). The AUC of the CT-based convolutional neural network predictive model and the integrated model was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.98) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.99), respectively. Conclusion: An integrated deep learning model could be used to predict COVID-19 ARDS in critically ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.