Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37563948›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical radiation sciences2024

Brain metastases from breast cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review.

Mahdi Mohammadi, Sana Mohammadi, Hojatollah Hadizadeh, Mahsa Olfati, Fatemeh Moradi, Ghazal Tanzifi, Sadegh Ghaderi

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Post-COVID-19 conditions: a systematic review on advanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging findings.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Ki-67 correlations in breast cancer.Journal of medicine and life · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mahdi MohammadiDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sana MohammadiDepartment of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hojatollah HadizadehDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, School of Paramedical, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Mahsa OlfatiDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, School of Paramedical, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Fatemeh MoradiDepartment of Energy Engineering & Physics, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran.
Ghazal TanzifiDepartment of Nuclear Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Sadegh GhaderiDepartment of Neuroscience and Addiction Studies, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1334-8826
Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRAmirkabir University of Technology · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite improvements in imaging and treatment approaches, brain metastases (BMs) continue to be the primary cause of mortality and morbidity in about 20% of adult cancer patients. This research aimed to review the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical characteristics of BMs resulting from breast cancer (BC). A systematic review of original research articles published from January 2000 to June 2023. We selected studies that reported MRI findings of BMs in BC patients. We excluded reviews, case reports, books/book chapters, animal studies and irrelevant records. We identified 24 studies that included 1580 BC patients with BMs. T1-weighted (T1-w) (pre- and postcontrast), T2-weighted (T2-w), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and T2*-weighted (T2*-w) was used to measure the lesion size, shape and area. In other studies, advanced structural techniques including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) were used to more precisely and sensitively evaluate the pathological area. Furthermore, functional and metabolic techniques like functional MRI (fMRI), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) have also been utilised. The MRI findings of BMs varied depending on the MRI technique, the BC subtype, the lesion size and shape, the presence of haemorrhage or necrosis and the comparison with other brain tumours. Some MRI findings were associated with prognosis, recurrence or cognitive impairment in BC patients with BMs. MRI detects, characterises and monitors BMs from BC. Findings vary by MRI technique, BC subtype, lesion characteristics and comparison with other brain tumours. More research should validate emerging MRI techniques, determine the clinical implications of findings and explore the underlying mechanisms and biology of BMs from BC. MRI is a valuable tool for diagnosis, targeted therapy and studying BC metastasis.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsAdultDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyBrain metastasesbrain metastasisbreast cancermagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID37563948
PMCPMC10920938
OpenAlexW4385751958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.