Trial reportUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2023
Placebo-controlled randomized double-blind comparison of the analgesic efficacy of lidocaine spray and etofenamate spray in pain control of rib fractures.
Trial report in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating emergency department visits for spontaneous and traumatic pneumomediastinum: a retrospective analysis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs far as we could detect, we could not find any study in literature on the analgesic efficacy of spray forms of lidocaine and etofenamate in rib fractures. In this study, our aim is to empirically compare the analgesic efficacy of etofenamate spray, lidocaine 10% spray and placebo spray in the management of pain secondary to trauma secondary to isolated rib fractures.
methodsThe study was designed according to a single-center, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study model. About 30 sealed envelopes were prepared for each of the 3 groups and 30 patients were included in each group. A total of 84 cases were included in the study (three groups: 27, 28, 29).
resultsNumeric rating scale (NRS) grades at admission and at 15-30-60-120 min were similar between the three groups (P>0.05). Analysis findings of NRS perception differences between the initial NRS level and the 15-30-60-120th min NRS difference at the 0-120th min showed more lidocaine spray organs, and it was not clearly perceived that these four parameters went between the 3 groups for the outline.
conclusionThe analgesic efficacy of lidocaine 10% spray, etofenamate spray, and placebo spray used together with standard dexketoprofen 50 mg intravenous treatment in the pain management of rib fractures were similar to each other and although there was a difference at the 120th min, this difference was not statistically significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.