Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37563733›Full record

ArticleArthritis care & research2024

Structural Foot Characteristics in People With Midfoot Osteoarthritis: Cross-Sectional Findings From the Clinical Assessment Study of the Foot.

Merridy J Lithgow, Andrew K Buldt, Shannon E Munteanu, Michelle Marshall, Martin J Thomas, George Peat, Edward Roddy, Hylton B Menz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis care & research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. 3D foot and ankle radiographic measurement toolbox.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Merridy J LithgowSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4276-3079
Andrew K BuldtSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2020-2780
Shannon E MunteanuSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6780-2743
Michelle MarshallPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8163-6948
Martin J ThomasPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4951-9925
George PeatPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Edward RoddyPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8954-7082
Hylton B MenzSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2045-3846
La Trobe University · AUArthritis UK · GBNational Health Service · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 18174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study compared radiographic measures of foot structure between people with and without symptomatic radiographic midfoot osteoarthritis (OA).

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study of adults aged 50 years and older registered with four UK general practices who reported foot pain in the past year. Bilateral weightbearing dorsoplantar and lateral radiographs were obtained. Symptomatic radiographic midfoot OA was defined as midfoot pain in the last 4 weeks, combined with radiographic OA in one or more midfoot joints (first cuneometatarsal, second cuneometatarsal, navicular-first cuneiform, and talonavicular). Midfoot OA cases were matched 1:1 for sex and age to controls with a 5-year age tolerance. Eleven radiographic measures were extracted and compared between the groups using independent sample t-tests and effect sizes (Cohen's d).

resultsWe identified 63 midfoot OA cases (mean ± SD age was 66.8 ± 8.0 years, with 32 male and 31 female participants) and matched these to 63 controls (mean ± SD age was 65.9 ± 7.8 years). There were no differences in metatarsal lengths between the groups. However, those with midfoot OA had a higher calcaneal-first metatarsal angle (d = 0.43, small effect size, P = 0.018) and lower calcaneal inclination angle (d = 0.46, small effect size, P = 0.011) compared with controls.

conclusionsPeople with midfoot OA have a flatter foot posture compared with controls. Although caution is required when inferring causation from cross-sectional data, these findings are consistent with a pathomechanical pathway linking foot structure to the development of midfoot OA. Prospective studies are required to determine the temporal relationships between foot structure, function, and the development of this common and disabling condition.

Indexed as

FootOsteoarthritisAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFoot JointsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain

Identifiers

PMID37563733
PMCPMC11497243
OpenAlexW4385752219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.