Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37563727›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2023

CCR2 macrophage response determines the functional outcome following cardiomyocyte transplantation.

Praveen Vasudevan, Markus Wolfien, Heiko Lemcke, Cajetan Immanuel Lang, Anna Skorska, Ralf Gaebel, Anne-Marie Galow, Dirk Koczan, Tobias Lindner, Wendy Bergmann and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Praveen VasudevanDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Markus WolfienDepartment of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, Institute of Computer Science, University of Rostock, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Heiko LemckeDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Cajetan Immanuel LangDepartment of Cardiology, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Anna SkorskaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Ralf GaebelDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Anne-Marie GalowInstitute of Genome Biology, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), 18196, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Dirk KoczanCore Facility for Microarray Analysis, Institute for Immunology, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Tobias LindnerCore Facility Multimodal Small Animal Imaging, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Wendy BergmannCore Facility for Cell Sorting & Cell Analysis, Laboratory for Clinical Immunology, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Brigitte Mueller-HilkeCore Facility for Cell Sorting & Cell Analysis, Laboratory for Clinical Immunology, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Brigitte VollmarRudolf-Zenker-Institute for Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Bernd Joachim KrauseDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Olaf WolkenhauerRudolf-Zenker-Institute for Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Gustav SteinhoffDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Robert DavidDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057, Rostock, Germany. Robert.David@med.uni-rostock.de.
University of Rostock · DECenter for Scalable Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence · DEResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN) · DEStellenbosch University · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe immune response is a crucial factor for mediating the benefit of cardiac cell therapies. Our previous research showed that cardiomyocyte transplantation alters the cardiac immune response and, when combined with short-term pharmacological CCR2 inhibition, resulted in diminished functional benefit. However, the specific role of innate immune cells, especially CCR2 macrophages on the outcome of cardiomyocyte transplantation, is unclear.

methodsWe compared the cellular, molecular, and functional outcome following cardiomyocyte transplantation in wildtype and T cell- and B cell-deficient Rag2

resultsCompared to wildtype mice, Rag2

conclusionsOur results demonstrate that the improved functional outcome following cardiomyocyte transplantation is dependent on a specific CCR2 macrophage response. This work highlights the need to study the role of the immune response for cardiomyocyte cell therapy for successful clinical translation.

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionMyocytes, CardiacAnimalsMacrophagesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMonocytesCell therapyImmunocompromisedMachine learningMacrophagesMyocardial infarctionSingle-cell

Identifiers

PMID37563727
PMCPMC10416392
OpenAlexW4385740656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.