Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37563713›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2023

Intensive community care services for children and young people in psychiatric crisis: an expert opinion.

Eleanor Keiller, Saba Masood, Ben Hoi-Ching Wong, Cerian Avent, Kofi Bediako, Rebecca Margaret Bird, Isabel Boege, Marta Casanovas, Veronika Beatrice Dobler, Maya James and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Eleanor KeillerQueen Mary University of London, London, UK. e.keiller@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2316-3019
Saba MasoodQueen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Ben Hoi-Ching WongEast London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Cerian AventCentral and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kofi BediakoEast London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rebecca Margaret BirdWest London NHS Trust, Southall, UK.
Isabel BoegeMedical University Graz & ZfP Südwürttemberg, Graz, Austria.
Marta CasanovasSant Joan de Deu Paediatric Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Veronika Beatrice DoblerCambridgeshire and Peterborough Foundation Trust, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Maya JamesSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Beckenham, UK.
Jane KiernanSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Beckenham, UK.
Maria Martinez-HervesEast London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Thinh Vinh Thanh NgoCentral and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ana Pascual-SanchezSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Beckenham, UK.
Izabela PileckaKing's College London, London, UK.
Paul L PlenerMedical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Karin PrillingerMedical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Isabelle Sabbah LimGHU Paris psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Paris, France.
Tania SaourWest London NHS Trust, Southall, UK.
Nidhita SinghSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Beckenham, UK.
Eirini SkoutaSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Beckenham, UK.
Mariana SteffenQueen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Jovanka TolmacCentral and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Hemma VelaniCentral and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ruth WoolhouseEast London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Toby ZundelSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Beckenham, UK.
Dennis OugrinEast London NHS Foundation Trust & Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GBCentral and North West London NHS Foundation Trust · GBEast London NHS Foundation Trust · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBMedical University of Vienna · ATWest London Mental Health NHS Trust · GBCambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust · GBFHU Neurovasc · FRHospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona · ESKing's College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health 127408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren and young people's (CYP) mental health is worsening, and an increasing number are seeking psychiatric and mental health care. Whilst many CYPs with low-to-medium levels of psychiatric distress can be treated in outpatient services, CYPs in crisis often require inpatient hospital treatment. Although necessary in many cases, inpatient care can be distressing for CYPs and their families. Amongst other things, inpatient stays often isolate CYPs from their support networks and disrupt their education. In response to such limitations, and in order to effectively support CYPs with complex mental health needs, intensive community-based treatment models, which are known in this paper as intensive community care services (ICCS), have been developed. Although ICCS have been developed in a number of settings, there is, at present, little to no consensus of what ICCS entails.

methodsA group of child and adolescent mental health clinicians, researchers and academics convened in London in January 2023. They met to discuss and agree upon the minimum requirements of ICCS. The discussion was semi-structured and used the Dartmouth Assertive Community Treatment Fidelity Scale as a framework. Following the meeting, the agreed features of ICCS, as described in this paper, were written up.

resultsICCS was defined as a service which provides treatment primarily outside of hospital in community settings such as the school or home. Alongside this, ICCS should provide at least some out-of-hours support, and a minimum of 90% of CYPs should be supported at least twice per week. The maximum caseload should be approximately 5 clients per full time equivalent (FTE), and the minimum number of staff for an ICCS team should be 4 FTE. The group also confirmed the importance of supporting CYPs engagement with their communities and the need to remain flexible in treatment provision. Finally, the importance of robust evaluation utilising tools including the Children's Global Assessment Scale were agreed.

conclusionsThis paper presents the agreed minimum requirements of intensive community-based psychiatric care. Using the parameters laid out herein, clinicians, academics, and related colleagues working in ICCS should seek to further develop the evidence base for this treatment model.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesMental DisordersAdolescentAmbulatory CareChildHospitalizationHumansChildrenCommunity careInpatient careIntensive community care servicesMental healthTreatment modelYoung people

Identifiers

PMID37563713
PMCPMC10413710
OpenAlexW4385721461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.