Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37563631›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2023

Physicians' use and perceptions of genetic testing for rare diseases in China: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

Weida Liu, Peng Liu, Dan Guo, Ye Jin, Kun Zhao, Jiayin Zheng, Kexin Li, Linkang Li, Shuyang Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Weida LiuMedical Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Peng LiuMedical Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Dan GuoClinical Biobank, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Ye JinMedical Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Kun ZhaoVanke School of Public Health, Institute for Healthy China, Tsinghua University, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Jiayin ZhengVanke School of Public Health, Institute for Healthy China, Tsinghua University, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Kexin LiChina Alliance for Rare Diseases, Beijing, China.
Linkang LiChina Alliance for Rare Diseases, Beijing, China.
Shuyang ZhangMedical Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. shuyangzhang103@nrdrs.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1532-0029
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNTsinghua University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic testing can facilitate the diagnosis and subsequent therapeutic management of rare diseases. However, there is a lack of data on the use of genetic testing for rare diseases. This study aims to describe the utilization rate and troubles encountered by clinicians in treating rare diseases with genetic testing.

methodsA cross-sectional electronic questionnaire survey was conducted between June and October 2022 among the medical staff from the hospitals covering all provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions of China. The survey on genetic testing focused on whether genetic testing was used in the diagnosis and treatment of rare diseases, the specific methods of genetic testing, and the problems encountered when using genetic testing.

resultsA total of 20,132 physicians who had treated rare diseases were included, of whom 35.5% were from the central region, 36.7% were from the eastern region, and 27.8% were from the western region. The total utilization rate of genetic testing for rare diseases was 76.0% (95%CI: 75.4-76.6). The use of genetic testing was highest in the Eastern region (79.2% [95% CI: 78.3-80.1]), followed by the Central (75.9% [95% CI: 74.9-76.9]) and Western regions (71.9% [95% CI: 70.7-73.1]). More than 90% (94.1% [95%CI: 93.4-94.8]) of pediatricians had used genetic testing to treat rare diseases, with surgeons having the lowest use of genetic testing (58.3% [95% CI: 56.6-60.0]). Physicians' departments and education levels affect the use of genetic testing. Most physicians have used a variety of genetic tests in the management of rare diseases, the most popular methods were "Whole-exome sequencing (Proband)" and "Whole-exome sequencing (families of three or more)". Doctors have encountered many problems with the use of genetic testing in the diagnosis and treatment of rare diseases, among which the high price was the main concern of medical workers.

conclusionThree-quarters of physicians used genetic testing in rare disease practice, and there were regional differences in the use of genetic testing. Recognition of the utilization of genetic testing can help identify patterns of resource utilization in different regions and provide a more comprehensive picture of the epidemiology of rare diseases in jurisdictions.

Indexed as

PhysiciansRare DiseasesChinaCross-Sectional StudiesGenetic TestingHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAccessibilityGenetic testingRare diseasesUtilization

Identifiers

PMID37563631
PMCPMC10416371
OpenAlexW4385724925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.