Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37563584›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Health literacy strengths and challenges of people in New South Wales prisons: a cross-sectional survey using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ).

Scott Gill, Reem Zeki, Sharlene Kaye, Panayiota Zingirlis, Vicki Archer, Amy Lewandowski, Grantley Creighton, Caron Shaw, Julia Bowman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Developing a validity testing plan for a patient-reported outcome measure in a new context using the argument-based approach to validity.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Scott GillResearch Unit, Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Sydney, Australia. Scott.Gill@health.nsw.gov.au.
Reem ZekiResearch Unit, Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Sydney, Australia.
Sharlene KayeResearch Unit, Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Sydney, Australia.
Panayiota ZingirlisResearch Unit, Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Sydney, Australia.
Vicki ArcherResearch Unit, Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Sydney, Australia.
Amy LewandowskiResearch Unit, Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Sydney, Australia.
Grantley CreightonAboriginal Health, Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Sydney, Australia.
Caron ShawAdolescent Health, Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Sydney, Australia.
Julia BowmanResearch Unit, Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Sydney, Australia.
Swinburne University of Technology · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth literacy is an important factor for enabling people to manage their health and live long fulfilling lives. People in prison are frequently from marginalised communities, often out of reach of conventional community based health organisations, and have poorer health outcomes. It is essential to understanding the health literacy profiles of people in prison, and its contribution to the well-established health inequities and outcomes of this population. This study aimed to use a multi-dimensional health literacy measurement tool to describe the strengths and challenges of adults incarcerated in NSW prisons.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted for people in prison across 14 publicly operated metropolitan prisons. Data were collected from 471 participants using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). Participant characteristics and health conditions were also collected. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Effect sizes (ES) for standardised differences in means were used to describe the magnitude of difference between participant characteristic groups.

resultsParticipants' median age was 38.0 (range 19 - 91) years. Males comprised 81% of the sample, 21% identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander, and 53% reported a health problem. People in prison had lower scores for all nine HLQ scales when compared to the general Australian population. Small to medium ES were seen for mean differences between most demographic groups. Compared to males, females had lower scores for several of the HLQ scales including 'having sufficient information to manage health' (ES 0.30 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.07, 0.53]), 'ability to actively engage with health care professionals' (ES 0.30 [95% CI 0.06, 0.53]), 'navigating the healthcare system' (ES 0.30 [95% CI 0.06, 0.53]), and, 'ability to find good health information' (ES 0.33 [95% CI 0.10, 0.57]). Differing health literacy scale scores with small to medium ES were found when comparing participants by legal status. Mainly small ES were seen when comparing other participant characteristic groups.

conclusionsThis study provides insights into the health literacy strengths and challenges for people in NSW prisons. These findings highlight the important role health literacy could have in addressing health disparities in this vulnerable population and can inform prison health services.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyPrisonsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew South WalesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAccessHealth inequitiesHealth literacyHealth literacy questionnaireHLQPrisonsPublic health

Identifiers

PMID37563584
PMCPMC10413686
OpenAlexW4385739764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.