ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2023
Perioperative lung function following flow controlled ventilation for robot-assisted prostatectomies in steep trendelenburg position: an observational study.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSteep Trendelenburg position combined with capnoperitoneum can lead to pulmonary complications and prolonged affection of postoperative lung function. Changes in pulmonary function occur independent of different modes of ventilation and levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The effect of flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) has not been evaluated yet. We perioperatively measured spirometric lung function parameters in patients undergoing robot-assisted prostatectomy under FCV. Our primary hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the ratio of the maximal mid expiratory and inspiratory flow (MEF50/MIF50) after surgery.
methodsIn 20 patients, spirometric measurements were obtained preoperatively, 40, 120, and 240 min and 1 and 5 days postoperatively. We measured MEF50/MIF50, vital capacity (VC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and intraoperative ventilation parameters.
resultsMEF50/MIF50 ratio increased from 0.92 (CI 0.73-1.11) to 1.38 (CI 1.01-1.75, p < 0.0001) and returned to baseline within 24 h, while VC and FEV1 decreased postoperatively with a second nadir at 24 h and only normalized by the fifth day (p < 0.0001). Compared to patients with PCV, postoperative lung function changes similarly.
conclusionFlow-controlled ventilation led to changes in lung function similar to those observed with pressure-controlled ventilation. While the ratio of MEF50/MIF50 normalized within 24 h, VC and FEV1 recovered within 5 days after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.