Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37563513›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2024

Social prioritisation in scene viewing and the effects of a spatial memory load.

A P Martinez-Cedillo, Kevin Dent, Tom Foulsham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A P Martinez-CedilloDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK. priscilla.martinezcedillo@york.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7327-3614
Kevin DentDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex, CO4 3SQ, UK.
Tom FoulshamDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex, CO4 3SQ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When free-viewing scenes, participants tend to preferentially fixate social elements (e.g., people). In the present study, we tested whether this bias would be disrupted by increasing the demands of a secondary dual-task: holding a set of (one or six) spatial locations in memory, presented either simultaneously or sequentially. Following a retention interval, participants judged whether a test location was present in the to-be-remembered stimuli. During the retention interval participants free-viewed scenes containing a social element (a person) and a non-social element (an object) that served as regions of interest. In order to assess the impact of physical salience, the non-social element was presented in both an unaltered baseline version, and in a version where its salience was artificially increased. The results showed that the preference to look at social elements decreased when the demands of the spatial memory task were increased from one to six locations, regardless of presentation mode (simultaneous or sequential). The high-load condition also resulted in more central fixations and reduced exploration of the scene. The results indicate that the social prioritisation effect, and scene viewing more generally, can be affected by a concurrent memory load.

Indexed as

AttentionSpatial MemoryAdultFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMalePattern Recognition, VisualRetention, PsychologySocial PerceptionSpace PerceptionYoung AdultAttentional captureEye movements and visual attentionMemoryVisual working and short-term memory

Identifiers

PMID37563513
PMCPMC11093800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.