ArticleScientific reports2023
3D reconstruction of coronary artery bifurcations from intravascular ultrasound and angiography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of Post-stenting Lumen Dimensions Using High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Patient-Specific 3D Coronary Reconstruction and Computational Simulations to Guide Drug-Coated Balloon Intervention: First-in-Human Experience.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- AI-based modality-agnostic classification system for vascular calcifications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Artery Interventions: Preprocedural Planning and Procedural Assistance.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Review
- Advancements in Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Techniques: Insights From Computational and Bench Testing Studies.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Patient-specificFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coronary bifurcation lesions represent a challenging anatomical subset, and the understanding of their 3D anatomy and plaque composition appears to play a key role in devising the optimal stenting strategy. This study proposes a new approach for the 3D reconstruction of coronary bifurcations and plaque materials by combining intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and angiography. Three patient-specific silicone bifurcation models were 3D reconstructed and compared to micro-computed tomography (µCT) as the gold standard to test the accuracy and reproducibility of the proposed methodology. The clinical feasibility of the method was investigated in three diseased patient-specific bifurcations of varying anatomical complexity. The IVUS-based 3D reconstructed bifurcation models showed high agreement with the µCT reference models, with r
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.