ArticlePediatric radiology2023
Tolerability and efficacy of a reduced dose adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance protocol under general anesthesia in infants and children.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pediatric Use of Regadenoson for Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Literature Review.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Review
- Reduced adenosine dosing for stress cardiovascular MRI in children: adequate physiologic stress for patient, fewer adverse events, and less stress for the clinician?Pediatric radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntravenous adenosine induces pharmacological stress by causing vasodilatation and thus carries the risk of severe hypotension when combined with vasodilatory effects of anesthetic agents.
objectiveThis study describes our experience with a reduced dose adenosine cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol in young children under general anesthesia (GA). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a retrospective report of all patients from birth to 18 years who underwent adenosine stress cardiac MRI under GA between August 2018 and November 2022. Based on our anecdotal experience of severe adverse effects in patients receiving adenosine infusion under GA and in discussion with the pediatric anesthesia team, we developed a modified protocol starting at a dose of 110 mcg/kg/min with incremental escalation to a full dose of 140 mcg/kg/min to achieve desired hemodynamic effect.
resultsTwenty-two children (mean age 6.5 years, mean weight 28 kg) satisfied the inclusion criteria. The diagnoses included Kawasaki disease (7), anomalous aortic origin of left coronary artery (3), anomalous aortic origin of right coronary artery (2), coronary fistula (3), repaired d-transposition of great arteries (2), repaired anomalous left coronary artery from pulmonary artery (2), repaired truncus arteriosus with left coronary artery occlusion (1), extracardiac-Fontan with left coronary artery myocardial bridge (1), and post heart transplantation (1). Nine patients needed dose escalation beyond 110 mcg/kg/min. Two patients had transient hypotension during testing (systemic blood pressure drop > 25 mmHg). No patient developed significant heart block or bronchospasm. Six patients (repeat study in one) demonstrated inducible perfusion defects (27%) on stress perfusion sequences-5 of whom had confirmed significant coronary abnormalities on angiography or direct surgical inspection.
conclusionA reduced/incremental dose adenosine stress cardiac MRI protocol under GA in children is safe and feasible. This avoids severe hypotension which is both unsafe and may result in inaccurate data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.