Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37563231›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2024

Body composition from birth to 2 years.

Andrew P Hills, Shane A Norris, Nuala M Byrne, Sisitha Jayasinghe, Alexia J Murphy-Alford, Cornelia U Loechl, Leila I Cheikh Ismail, Anura V Kurpad, Rebecca Kuriyan, Lukhanyo H Nyati and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Body composition at 2 years of age in moderate and late preterm infants.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Skeletal Muscle Mass Measured Noninvasively by DJournal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Andrew P HillsUniversity of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia. andrew.hills@utas.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7787-7201
Shane A NorrisUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7124-3788
Nuala M ByrneUniversity of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia.
Sisitha JayasingheUniversity of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8805-385X
Alexia J Murphy-AlfordInternational Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7095-3796
Cornelia U LoechlInternational Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7959-6270
Leila I Cheikh IsmailUniversity of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Anura V KurpadSt. John's Research Institute, Bangalore, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7998-2438
Rebecca KuriyanSt. John's Research Institute, Bangalore, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3864-574X
Lukhanyo H NyatiUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0975-344X
Ina S SantosFederal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1258-9249
Caroline S CostaFederal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
V Pujitha WickramasingheUniversity of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
M Nishani LucasUniversity of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-7525
Christine SlaterInternational Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6820-0760
Ayesha YameenPakistan Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology (PINSTECH), Nilore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0845-1469
Shabina AriffAga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Multi-center Infant Body Composition Reference Study (MIBCRS)

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) OPP1143641International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) CRP43028International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) CRPE1143641International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) CRPE43028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing all infants with the best start to life is a universal but challenging goal for the global community. Historically, the size and shape of infants, quantified by anthropometry and commencing with birthweight, has been the common yardstick for physical growth and development. Anthropometry has long been considered a proxy for nutritional status during infancy when, under ideal circumstances, changes in size and shape are most rapid. Developed from data collected in the Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS), WHO Child Growth Standards for healthy infants and children have been widely accepted and progressively adopted. In contrast, and somewhat surprisingly, much less is understood about the 'quality' of growth as reflected by body composition during infancy. Recent advances in body composition assessment, including the more widespread use of air displacement plethysmography (ADP) across the first months of life, have contributed to a progressive increase in our knowledge and understanding of growth and development. Along with stable isotope approaches, most commonly the deuterium dilution (DD) technique, the criterion measure of total body water (TBW), our ability to quantify lean and fat tissue using a two-compartment model, has been greatly enhanced. However, until now, global reference charts for the body composition of healthy infants have been lacking. This paper details some of the historical challenges associated with the assessment of body composition across the first two years of life, and references the logical next steps in growth assessments, including reference charts.

Indexed as

Body CompositionPlethysmographyAnthropometryBody WaterChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolGrowth ChartsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNutritional StatusReference Values

Identifiers

PMID37563231
PMCPMC11537967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.