ArticleScientific reports2023
Supervised machine learning classification of psychosis biotypes based on brain structure: findings from the Bipolar-Schizophrenia network for intermediate phenotypes (B-SNIP).
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dissecting Schizophrenia Biology Using Pleiotropy With Cognitive Genomics.Biological psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Mapping the psychosis spectrum - imaging neurosubtypes from multiscale functional network connectivity.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Volume and Tempo: Cortical Excitability and Trial-to-Trial Consistency of Auditory Responses Distinguish Psychosis Biotypes.Research square · 2026Article
- Stress and synaptic density in psychosis and clinical high risk: evidence from [Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Brain Age Disparities in Psychosis Across DSM Diagnoses and B-SNIP Biotypes.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- The breakthrough discoveries for thriving with bipolar disorder (BDInternational journal of bipolar disorders · 2025Article
- Diagnostic utility of biomarkers in progressive supranuclear palsy: toward a biotyping framework.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Differentiating biomarker features and familial characteristics of B-SNIP psychosis Biotypes.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- Neurobiology-based cognitive biotypes using multi-scale intrinsic connectivity networks in psychotic disorders.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Identifying neurobiological heterogeneity in clinical high-risk psychosis: a data-driven biotyping approach using resting-state functional connectivity.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Developmental perspectives on the origins of psychotic disorders: The need for a transdiagnostic approach.Development and psychopathology · 2024Review
- Dissecting Schizophrenia Biology Using Pleiotropy with Cognitive Genomics.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Factors associated with suicide attempts in the antecedent illness trajectory of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional diagnostic formulations of psychotic disorders have low correspondence with underlying disease neurobiology. This has led to a growing interest in using brain-based biomarkers to capture biologically-informed psychosis constructs. Building upon our prior work on the B-SNIP Psychosis Biotypes, we aimed to examine whether structural MRI (an independent biomarker not used in the Biotype development) can effectively classify the Biotypes. Whole brain voxel-wise grey matter density (GMD) maps from T1-weighted images were used to train and test (using repeated randomized train/test splits) binary L2-penalized logistic regression models to discriminate psychosis cases (n = 557) from healthy controls (CON, n = 251). A total of six models were evaluated across two psychosis categorization schemes: (i) three Biotypes (B1, B2, B3) and (ii) three DSM diagnoses (schizophrenia (SZ), schizoaffective (SAD) and bipolar (BD) disorders). Above-chance classification accuracies were observed in all Biotype (B1 = 0.70, B2 = 0.65, and B3 = 0.56) and diagnosis (SZ = 0.64, SAD = 0.64, and BD = 0.59) models. However, the only model that showed evidence of specificity was B1, i.e., the model was able to discriminate B1 vs. CON and did not misclassify other psychosis cases (B2 or B3) as B1 at rates above nominal chance. The GMD-based classifier evidence for B1 showed a negative association with an estimate of premorbid general intellectual ability, regardless of group membership, i.e. psychosis or CON. Our findings indicate that, complimentary to clinical diagnoses, the B-SNIP Psychosis Biotypes may offer a promising approach to capture specific aspects of psychosis neurobiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.