ArticleScientific reports2023
Fine-grained cell-type specific association studies with human bulk brain data using a large single-nucleus RNA sequencing based reference panel.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A large-scale DNA methylation study of alcohol use identified robust associations and cell-type specific insights.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Cellular heterogeneity and multicellular mechanisms in the pathogenesis of late-life depression: insights from single-cell and spatial multi-omics.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- From Biomarkers to Behavior: Mapping the Neuroimmune Web of Pain, Mood, and Memory.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- lute: estimating the cell composition of heterogeneous tissue with varying cell sizes using gene expression.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Investigating neonatal health risk variables through cell-type specific methylome-wide association studies.Clinical epigenetics · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Brain disorders are leading causes of disability worldwide. Gene expression studies provide promising opportunities to better understand their etiology but it is critical that expression is studied on a cell-type level. Cell-type specific association studies can be performed with bulk expression data using statistical methods that capitalize on cell-type proportions estimated with the help of a reference panel. To create a fine-grained reference panel for the human prefrontal cortex, we performed an integrated analysis of the seven largest single nucleus RNA-seq studies. Our panel included 17 cell-types that were robustly detected across all studies, subregions of the prefrontal cortex, and sex and age groups. To estimate the cell-type proportions, we used an empirical Bayes estimator that substantially outperformed three estimators recommended previously after a comprehensive evaluation of methods to estimate cell-type proportions from brain transcriptome data. This is important as being able to precisely estimate the cell-type proportions may avoid unreliable results in downstream analyses particularly for the multiple cell-types that had low abundances. Transcriptome-wide association studies performed with permuted bulk expression data showed that it is possible to perform transcriptome-wide association studies for even the rarest cell-types without an increased risk of false positives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.