Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37563170›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Alternating capture of attention by multiple visual working memory representations.

Lunbo Zhang, Yuki Yamada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lunbo ZhangGraduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan. zhanglunbo014@gmail.com.
Yuki YamadaFaculty of Arts and Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1431-568X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Can we look for multiple objects simultaneously? Previous studies have proposed that the representation of an item in visual working memory (VWM) can bias the deployment of attention to memory-matching items in visual search. However, it is still controversial whether multiple VWM item representations are able to capture attention. In the present study, we adopted an eye-tracking technique to reveal this issue. In Experiment 1, we replicated Chen and Du's Experiment 2 and adopted an eye-tracking technique to determine whether multiple VWM item representations are able to bias attention. In Chen and Du's paradigm, the memory test was always followed by the search test, and the participants might intentionally prepare for the search task, which can affect the results of the research. Thus, in Experiment 2, we prevented participants from predicting the temporal occurrence of the visual search task by randomly conducting a search test or a memory test after memoranda. The findings of the present study suggested that only one working memory item at a time influences attention and multiple working memory items may affect attention through alternation. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on September 5, 2022. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BE529 .

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermVisual PerceptionEye-Tracking TechnologyHumans

Identifiers

PMID37563170
PMCPMC10415262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.