Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37563117›Full record

ReviewNature communications2023

Applied machine learning as a driver for polymeric biomaterials design.

Samantha M McDonald, Emily K Augustine, Quinn Lanners, Cynthia Rudin, L Catherine Brinson, Matthew L Becker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Microengineered Gradient Hydrogels for Mechanobiology.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samantha M McDonaldDepartment of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2943-1026
Emily K AugustineThomas Lord Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Quinn LannersDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7401-9239
Cynthia RudinDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4283-2780
L Catherine BrinsonThomas Lord Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Matthew L BeckerDepartment of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. matthew.l.becker@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4089-6916

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) DGE-2022040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymers are ubiquitous to almost every aspect of modern society and their use in medical products is similarly pervasive. Despite this, the diversity in commercial polymers used in medicine is stunningly low. Considerable time and resources have been extended over the years towards the development of new polymeric biomaterials which address unmet needs left by the current generation of medical-grade polymers. Machine learning (ML) presents an unprecedented opportunity in this field to bypass the need for trial-and-error synthesis, thus reducing the time and resources invested into new discoveries critical for advancing medical treatments. Current efforts pioneering applied ML in polymer design have employed combinatorial and high throughput experimental design to address data availability concerns. However, the lack of available and standardized characterization of parameters relevant to medicine, including degradation time and biocompatibility, represents a nearly insurmountable obstacle to ML-aided design of biomaterials. Herein, we identify a gap at the intersection of applied ML and biomedical polymer design, highlight current works at this junction more broadly and provide an outlook on challenges and future directions.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsPolymersBiocompatible MaterialsPolymers

Identifiers

PMID37563117
PMCPMC10415291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.