ArticleBJGP open2023
Training primary care staff in delivering the primary care consultation remotely: a systematic review.
Article in BJGP open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of training and education programs for healthcare professionals on video- and text-based consultations in ensuring healthcare quality: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Digital first primary care in NHS England: evaluating alignment with patient-centered care and implications for future practice.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Do Medical Schools Need to Adapt Their Curriculum in Order to Teach Medical Students 'Webside' Manner? A Systematic Review.Medical science educator · 2025Review
- No time to wait: resilience as a cornerstone for primary health care across Latin America and the Caribbean, a World Bank-PAHO Lancet Regional Health Americas Commission.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Review
- 'It gives a sense of purpose': a survey exploring GP registrars' views on relational continuity of care.BJGP open · 2025Article
- The educational effects of telemedicine training using role-playing for general practice/family medicine residents: A qualitative study.Journal of general and family medicine · 2025Article
- Training needs in telerehabilitation: results of a cross-sectional online survey with therapists and patients.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRemote consultation is widely used in primary care, and its use has increased greatly since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this, primary care clinicians lack formal training in delivering remote consultation. There is a need to understand how training might best be delivered, and what evidence there is to support this.
aimTo summarise existing published literature about training primary care staff in conducting primary care consultation remotely, to outline which models of training may be effective, and to identify unanswered questions for future research. DESIGN &
settingSystematic review of English language studies in primary care included in Medline (Ovid), Cochrane Database, PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Web of Science, and CINAHL from 2010-2021; and in Google results from 2010-2022.
methodDatabases were searched using a predefined search strategy. Title, abstract, and full-text screening was conducted to identify eligible studies for inclusion in the review. The quality of included studies was assessed, and findings were synthesised to answer the research questions.
resultsWe included 10 studies. Seven examined training on remote consultation with trainee GPs or residents, and three examined training on remote consultation with qualified primary care clinicians. Training described led to positive change overall, including increased confidence and self-efficacy in delivering remote consultations. Furthermore, trainees reported increased use of remote consultation, increased efficiency, and increased engagement from patients. Studies where training involved workshops or didactic learning alongside experiential learning resulted in more positive feelings and more confidence about how technology could aid consultations.
conclusionThere is limited evidence on training primary care staff in conducting remote consultation. Available evidence indicates that training has a positive impact on the ability of clinicians and staff to deliver remote consultation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.