Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37562195›Full record

ArticleESMO open2023

Retrospective study to estimate the prevalence and describe the clinicopathological characteristics, treatments received, and outcomes of HER2-low breast cancer.

G Viale, M Basik, N Niikura, E Tokunaga, S Brucker, F Penault-Llorca, N Hayashi, J Sohn, R Teixeira de Sousa, A M Brufsky and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04807595 (A Multicenter Study to Estimate the Prevalence of HER2 Low and Describe the SoC, Treatment Patterns, and Outcome in Real-world Practice Among Unresectable and/or Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients With HER2-low Status - the RetroBC-HER2L Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04807595 completednot on this map

A Multicenter Study to Estimate the Prevalence of HER2 Low and Describe the SoC, Treatment Patterns, and Outcome in Real-world Practice Among Unresectable and/or Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients With HER2-low Status - the RetroBC-HER2L Study

TypeobservationalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled798ConditionsBreast CancerArmsNone (Observational study)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Is the risk of brain metastasis and prognosis different in HER2-low breast cancer?Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

G VialeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: giuseppe.viale@ieo.it.
M BasikLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
N NiikuraTokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan.
E TokunagaNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan.
S BruckerResearch Institute for Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
F Penault-LlorcaCentre Jean Perrin, Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, U1240 Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques, Clermont Ferrand, France.
N HayashiSt Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Tokyo Prefecture, Japan.
J SohnYonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
R Teixeira de SousaHospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
A M BrufskyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, USA.
C S O'BrienThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
F SchmittMedical Faculty of the University of Porto, CINTESIS@RISE (Health Research Network), Molecular Pathology Unit, Ipatimup, Porto, Portugal.
G HigginsVictorian Cancer Biobank, Melbourne, Australia.
D VargheseEpidemiology, Global Real World Evidence Generation, OBU Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, USA.
G D JamesMedical Statistics Consultancy Ltd, London, UK.
A MohDaiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, USA.
A LivingstonGlobal Medical Affairs, Medical Breast, OBU Medical, AstraZeneca, City House, Cambridge, UK.
V de Giorgio-MillerGlobal Medical Affairs, Medical Breast, OBU Medical, AstraZeneca, City House, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 80% of all breast cancers (BCs) are currently categorized as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative [immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0, 1+, or 2+/in situ hybridization (ISH) negative]; approximately 60% of BCs traditionally categorized as HER2-negative express low levels of HER2. HER2-low (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-) status became clinically actionable with approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan to treat unresectable/metastatic HER2-low BC. Greater understanding of patients with HER2-low disease is urgently needed. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis global, multicenter, retrospective study (NCT04807595) included tissue samples from patients with confirmed HER2-negative unresectable/metastatic BC [any hormone receptor (HR) status] diagnosed from 2014 to 2017. Pathologists rescored HER2 IHC-stained slides as HER2-low (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-) or HER2 IHC 0 after training on low-end expression scoring using Ventana 4B5 and other assays at local laboratories (13 sites; 10 countries) blinded to historical scores. HER2-low prevalence and concordance between historical scores and rescores were assessed. Demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were examined.

resultsIn rescored samples from 789 patients with HER2-negative unresectable/metastatic BC, the overall HER2-low prevalence was 67.2% (HR positive, 71.1%; HR negative, 52.8%). Concordance was moderate between historical and rescored HER2 statuses (81.3%; κ = 0.583); positive agreement was numerically higher for HER2-low (87.5%) than HER2 IHC 0 (69.9%). More than 30% of historical IHC 0 cases were rescored as HER2-low overall (all assays) and using Ventana 4B5. There were no notable differences between HER2-low and HER2 IHC 0 in patient characteristics, treatments received, or clinical outcomes.

conclusionsApproximately two-thirds of patients with historically HER2-negative unresectable/metastatic BC may benefit from HER2-low-directed treatments. Our data suggest that HER2 reassessment in patients with historical IHC 0 scores may be considered to help optimize selection of patients for treatment. Further, accurate identification of patients with HER2-low BC may be achieved with standardized pathologist training.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansIn Situ HybridizationPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinasesbreast cancerHER2-lowhuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2immunohistochemistryprevalenceretrospective study

Identifiers

PMID37562195
PMCPMC10515285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.