Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37561748›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol.

Meredith Vanstone, Rebecca H Correia, Michelle Howard, Elizabeth Darling, Hamideh Bayrampour, Andrea Carruthers, Amie Davis, Dima Hadid, Erin Hetherington, Aaron Jones and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05663762 (How do Perceptions of Coronavirus Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05663762 completednot on this map

How do Perceptions of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Risk Influence Health Decisions in Pregnancy?

TypeobservationalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled136,500ConditionsPregnancy Related
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. SARS-CoV-2, Tdap, and influenza vaccination during pregnancy from 2019 to 2022 in Ontario, Canada: a population-based retrospective cohort study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Meredith VanstoneDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7347-6259
Rebecca H CorreiaHealth Research Methodology Graduate Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2949-2400
Michelle HowardDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Elizabeth DarlingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Hamideh BayrampourDepartment of Family Practice, Midwifery Program, University of British Columbia, University Endowment Lands, Canada.
Andrea CarruthersDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-9798-0218
Amie DavisDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Dima HadidHealth Policy PhD Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Erin HetheringtonDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Aaron JonesDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Sujane KandasamyDepartment of Child and Youth Health, Brock University, St. Catharines, Canada.
Cassandra KuyvenhovenDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Jessica LiauwDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, University Endowment Lands, Canada.
Sarah D McDonaldDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4461-2178
Caroline MniszakSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, University Endowment Lands, Canada.
Monica L MolinaroDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Manisha PahwaHealth Policy PhD Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Tejal PatelDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Marina SadikDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Njideka SanyaDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Katrina ShenDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Devon GreysonSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, University Endowment Lands, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4860-384X

Funding

CIHR 179921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPregnant people have a higher risk of severe COVID-19 disease. They have been disproportionately impacted by COVID-19 infection control policies, which exacerbated conditions resulting in intimate partner violence, healthcare access, and mental health distress. This project examines the impact of accumulated individual health decisions and describes how perinatal care and health outcomes changed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

objectivesQuantitative strand: Describe differences between 2019, 2021, and 2022 birth groups related to maternal vaccination, perinatal care, and mental health care. Examine the differential impacts on racialized and low-income pregnant people.Qualitative strand: Understand how pregnant people's perceptions of COVID-19 risk influenced their decision-making about vaccination, perinatal care, social support, and mental health. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a Canadian convergent parallel mixed-methods study. The quantitative strand uses a retrospective cohort design to assess birth group differences in rates of Tdap and COVID-19 vaccination, gestational diabetes screening, length of post-partum hospital stay, and onset of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder, using administrative data from ICES, formerly the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Ontario) and PopulationData BC (PopData) (British Columbia). Differences by socioeconomic and ethnocultural status will also be examined. The qualitative strand employs qualitative description to interview people who gave birth between May 2020- December 2021 about their COVID-19 risk perception and health decision-making process. Data integration will occur during design and interpretation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received ethical approval from McMaster University and the University of British Columbia. Findings will be disseminated via manuscripts, presentations, and patient-facing infographics.

trial registrationRegistration: Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT05663762.

Indexed as

COVID-19British ColumbiaCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansPandemicsPregnancyRetrospective StudiesCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID37561748
PMCPMC10414672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.