Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37561717›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

A new systematic collection and classification of odour words by using a product review dataset.

Naoya Zushi, Genki Takeuchi, Midori Ogawa, Naomi Gotow, Hideki Kakeya, Tatsu Koabayakawa, Saho Ayabe-Kanamura

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naoya ZushiGraduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5005-6673
Genki TakeuchiGraduate School of Science and Technology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Midori OgawaInstitute of Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Naomi GotowHuman Informatics and Interaction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Hideki KakeyaInstitute of Engineering, Information and Systems, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Tatsu KoabayakawaHuman Informatics and Interaction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Saho Ayabe-KanamuraInstitute of Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
University of Tsukuba · JPNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The odours encountered on a daily basis are dependent on an individual's society and culture. Therefore, when conducting olfactory tests, the odour stimuli utilized must be appropriate for the individual's environment. In this study, we gathered and classified the odours experienced by Japanese individuals in their daily lives through a large dataset of product reviews encompassing food and household items. Specifically, we performed morphological analysis on product review sentences in Japanese that contained odour descriptions, and we compiled the nouns used to describe odours. A total of 617,208 sentences that reviewed odour experiences and their corresponding nouns were collected. The top 100 frequently used odour nouns were classified into 15 clusters according to the context in which they were used. The methodology employed in collecting and classifying odour nouns as presented in this study can be utilized in other situations. It can assist in selecting appropriate odour stimuli for the olfactory test based on the society, culture, and time period.

Indexed as

OdorantsSmellFoodHumans

Identifiers

PMID37561717
PMCPMC10414683
OpenAlexW4385727671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.