Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37561669›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

Ten quick tips for harnessing the power of ChatGPT in computational biology.

Tiago Lubiana, Rafael Lopes, Pedro Medeiros, Juan Carlo Silva, Andre Nicolau Aquime Goncalves, Vinicius Maracaja-Coutinho, Helder I Nakaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Recent advances in antibody optimization based on deep learning methods.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. PheNormGPT: a framework for extraction and normalization of key medical findings.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A reasonable request for true data sharing.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tiago LubianaSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2473-2313
Rafael LopesDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases and Public Health Modeling Unit, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9416-6145
Pedro MedeirosTauGC Bioinformatics, São Paulo, Brazil.
Juan Carlo SilvaSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7327-4294
Andre Nicolau Aquime GoncalvesOxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5264-8368
Vinicius Maracaja-CoutinhoAdvanced Center for Chronic Diseases, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-8873-9381
Helder I NakayaSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5297-9108

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputational Biology

Identifiers

PMID37561669
PMCPMC10414555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.