ArticleJournal of animal science2023
Predicting dry matter intake in beef cattle.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting beef diet nutritional composition and intake from rumen metagenomic profiles.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026Article
- Research on the Assessment of Dairy Cow Dry Matter Intake Using ITSO-Optimized Stacking Ensemble Learning.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Generalizable long short-term memory models for beef cattle DMI under grazing.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Diet format, protein, amino acids, salt, and osmolytes, as well as water viscosity, affect water consumption in domestic cats: a scoping review of 32 publications (published from 1975 to 2025) on water intake, hydration status, and related health outcomes.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Characterization of individual beef cattle water intake.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Associations Between Feeding Behaviors, Residual Feed Intake, and Residual Average Daily Gain in Performance Tested Yearling Bulls and Heifers Fed a High-Forage Diet.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Big Data and AI-Powered Modeling: A Pathway to Sustainable Precision Animal Nutrition.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Technical Note: Assessment of a Novel Method to Measure Water Intake in Beef Cattle and Its Application to Determining Dry Matter Intake.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Article
- Predicting dry matter intake in cattle at scale using gradient boosting regression techniques and Gaussian process boosting regression with Shapley additive explanation explainable artificial intelligence, MLflow, and its containerization.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Technology that facilitates estimations of individual animal dry matter intake (DMI) rates in group-housed settings will improve production and management efficiencies. Estimating DMI in pasture settings or facilities where feed intake cannot be monitored may benefit from predictive algorithms that use other variables as proxies. This study examined the relationships between DMI, animal performance, and environmental variables. Here we determined whether a machine learning approach can predict DMI from measured water intake variables, age, sex, full body weight, and average daily gain (ADG). Two hundred and five animals were studied in a drylot setting (152 bulls for 88 d and 53 steers for 50 d). Collected data included daily DMI, water intake, daily predicted full body weights, and ADG using In-Pen-Weighing Positions and Feed Intake Nodes. After exclusion of 26 bulls of low-frequency breeds and one severe (>3 standard deviations) outlier, the final number of animals used for modeling was 178 (125 bulls, 53 steers). Climate data were recorded at 30-min intervals throughout the study period. Random Forest Regression (RFR) and Repeated Measures Random Forest (RMRF) were used as machine learning approaches to develop a predictive algorithm. Repeated Measures ANOVA (RMANOVA) was used as the traditional approach. Using the RMRF method, an algorithm was constructed that predicts an animal's DMI within 0.75 kg. Evaluation and refining of algorithms used to predict DMI in drylot by adding more representative data will allow for future extrapolation to controlled small plot grazing and, ultimately, more extensive group field settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.