Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37561392›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2023

Predicting dry matter intake in beef cattle.

Nathan E Blake, Matthew Walker, Shane Plum, Jason A Hubbart, Joseph Hatton, Domingo Mata-Padrino, Ida Holásková, Matthew E Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Big Data and AI-Powered Modeling: A Pathway to Sustainable Precision Animal Nutrition.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nathan E BlakeSchool of Agriculture and Food, Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Design, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Matthew WalkerWest Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Shane PlumWest Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Jason A HubbartWest Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Joseph HattonWest Virginia Department of Agriculture, Charleston, WV 25305, USA.
Domingo Mata-PadrinoSchool of Agriculture and Food, Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Design, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Ida HoláskováWest Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Matthew E WilsonSchool of Agriculture and Food, Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Design, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7419-6358

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technology that facilitates estimations of individual animal dry matter intake (DMI) rates in group-housed settings will improve production and management efficiencies. Estimating DMI in pasture settings or facilities where feed intake cannot be monitored may benefit from predictive algorithms that use other variables as proxies. This study examined the relationships between DMI, animal performance, and environmental variables. Here we determined whether a machine learning approach can predict DMI from measured water intake variables, age, sex, full body weight, and average daily gain (ADG). Two hundred and five animals were studied in a drylot setting (152 bulls for 88 d and 53 steers for 50 d). Collected data included daily DMI, water intake, daily predicted full body weights, and ADG using In-Pen-Weighing Positions and Feed Intake Nodes. After exclusion of 26 bulls of low-frequency breeds and one severe (>3 standard deviations) outlier, the final number of animals used for modeling was 178 (125 bulls, 53 steers). Climate data were recorded at 30-min intervals throughout the study period. Random Forest Regression (RFR) and Repeated Measures Random Forest (RMRF) were used as machine learning approaches to develop a predictive algorithm. Repeated Measures ANOVA (RMANOVA) was used as the traditional approach. Using the RMRF method, an algorithm was constructed that predicts an animal's DMI within 0.75 kg. Evaluation and refining of algorithms used to predict DMI in drylot by adding more representative data will allow for future extrapolation to controlled small plot grazing and, ultimately, more extensive group field settings.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorWeight GainAnimal FeedAnimalsCattleDietDrinkingEatingMalecattledry matter intakemachine learning

Identifiers

PMID37561392
PMCPMC10503641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.