Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37561278›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2023

Exploring weight initialization, diversity of solutions, and degradation in recurrent neural networks trained for temporal and decision-making tasks.

Cecilia Jarne, Rodrigo Laje

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cecilia JarneUniversidad Nacional de Quilmes, Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología, Bernal, Buenos Aires, Argentina. cecilia.jarne@unq.edu.ar.
Rodrigo LajeUniversidad Nacional de Quilmes, Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología, Bernal, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) are frequently used to model aspects of brain function and structure. In this work, we trained small fully-connected RNNs to perform temporal and flow control tasks with time-varying stimuli. Our results show that different RNNs can solve the same task by converging to different underlying dynamics and also how the performance gracefully degrades as either network size is decreased, interval duration is increased, or connectivity damage is induced. For the considered tasks, we explored how robust the network obtained after training can be according to task parameterization. In the process, we developed a framework that can be useful to parameterize other tasks of interest in computational neuroscience. Our results are useful to quantify different aspects of the models, which are normally used as black boxes and need to be understood in order to model the biological response of cerebral cortex areas.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeurosciencesCerebral CortexNeural Networks, ComputerconnectivitydegradationRecurrent Neural Networks

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.