Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37561276›Full record

ArticleMolecular biotechnology2024

Enhancement in Bacterial Cellulolytic Enzyme Production Using Acid-Pretreated Banana Peel Waste: A Comparative Evaluation.

Pathan Ahemad Khan, Basant Lal, Preeti Singh, Rajeev Singh, Asad Syed, Abdallah M Elgorban, Meenakshi Verma, P K Mishra, Bhawna Verma, Neha Srivastava and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pathan Ahemad KhanDepartment of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU) Varanasi, Varanasi, 221005, India.
Basant LalDepartment of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Science and Humanities, GLA University, Mathura, 281406, India.
Preeti SinghDepartment of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU) Varanasi, Varanasi, 221005, India.
Rajeev SinghDepartment of Environmental Science, Jamia Millia Islamia Central University, New Delhi, 110025, India.
Asad SyedDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. 2455, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Abdallah M ElgorbanDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. 2455, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Meenakshi VermaUniversity Centre for Research & Development, Department of Chemistry, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, 140413, India.
P K MishraDepartment of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU) Varanasi, Varanasi, 221005, India.
Bhawna VermaDepartment of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU) Varanasi, Varanasi, 221005, India.
Neha SrivastavaDepartment of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU) Varanasi, Varanasi, 221005, India. sri.neha10may@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8760-0695
Anthonia O'DonovanApplied Biology and Biopharmaceuticals Sciences, Department of Science, Atlantic Technological University, Galway, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Banana peel waste is one of the major contributors in the issue raised from solid waste, however, it can be valorized effectively due to high content of cellulose and hemicellulose. Significant conversion of banana waste includes cellulolytic enzymes and bioenergy production. In the present study, bacterial cellulase was produced using raw banana peel and ripe banana peel under SSF. Additionally, impact of acid pretreatment was investigated as one of strategy to improve cellulolytic enzyme production. A comparative evaluation of raw and ripe banana peels showed that ripe banana peels showed better enzyme production after pretreatment with 0.5% dilute HCl acid. In the series of enhancement of the enzyme production, temperature and pH of the SSF medium were also investigated, and found temperature 35 °C and pH 6.0 were optimum to produce maximum 3.5-U/ml FPA, 39-U/ml BGL, and 54-U/ml EG in 18-h SSF incubation. The study presented eco-friendly waste management to produce industrial enzyme for its promising application in waste valorization and biorefinery area.

Indexed as

CellulaseCelluloseMusaHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationHydrolysisTemperatureWaste ProductsCellulaseCelluloseWaste ProductsBacterial cellulaseBanana peel wasteBioconversionSSFWaste management

Identifiers

PMID37561276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.